MENU
An architect needs an agnostic provider of persistent storage for their OpenShift Container Platform, that supports file, block, and object storage, either in-house or in hybrid clouds, Which provider should the architect choose?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium C1000-147 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
XO
Xochitl
11 months ago
Wait, can it really handle all three types of storage? That’s impressive!
LO
Lonny
11 months ago
OpenStack Cinder could work, but it might be overkill for some setups.
BL
Blair
11 months ago
Not sure about HostPath Storage, seems too limited for hybrid clouds.
LA
Lauran
12 months ago
Definitely agree with that! It supports all types of storage.
KA
Karan
12 months ago
I think Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is the best choice.
BO
Bok
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards D, OpenStack Cinder, but I’m not confident it supports all those storage types as well as the others.
AN
An
1 year ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, and it was about choosing a storage solution that integrates well with Kubernetes.
SH
Sherell
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about FlexVolume Drives being more limited in functionality compared to other options.
JE
Jerilyn
1 year ago
I think the answer might be B, Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage, since it’s designed for OpenShift and supports multiple storage types.
HE
Helga
1 year ago
I've seen this type of issue before. My guess is that LTM-B is the device eligible to initiate the config-sync, so that's likely the reason it's failing on LTM-D.
CA
Carisa
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements for the campus and branch sites seem straightforward, but I'll need to do some quick calculations to figure out the best CIDR block sizes.
EL
Eliseo
1 year ago
I bet the architect is just itching to get this right - they don't want to end up in a storage pickle, do they?
DI
Diego
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one, maybe the architect should research more before deciding.
HI
Hillary
1 year ago
C) FlexVolume Drives
WI
Willodean
1 year ago
Hmm, that could be a good choice for hybrid cloud storage, worth looking into.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
D) OpenStack Cinder
PU
Pura
1 year ago
I think the architect should consider this option too, it might fit their requirements.
VA
Valene
1 year ago
A) HostPath Storage
GE
Geoffrey
1 year ago
That's a solid choice, it offers the flexibility and support the architect needs.
VI
Virgie
1 year ago
B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage
DO
Donette
1 year ago
C) FlexVolume Drives could provide the flexibility the architect is looking for.
KR
Krystina
1 year ago
D) OpenStack Cinder might be worth considering as well.
DE
Detra
1 year ago
A) HostPath Storage could also be a good option for their needs.
LI
Lili
1 year ago
B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage would be the best choice for the architect.
CE
Celeste
2 years ago
I heard Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is pretty robust and can handle a variety of storage needs. Sounds like the perfect solution for this architect's requirements.
GL
Glen
2 years ago
OpenStack Cinder is an interesting choice, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit for an OpenShift environment. B) seems like the safer bet.
TR
Tricia
1 year ago
I agree, B) seems like the safer bet for an OpenShift environment.
TR
Tricia
1 year ago
B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage
RA
Raylene
2 years ago
I'm not sure about the HostPath Storage or FlexVolume Drives options. They don't seem to fit the requirement of being agnostic and supporting multiple storage types.
MA
Margart
2 years ago
I'm not sure, I think HostPath Storage could also be a good choice for in-house storage.
SE
Sean
2 years ago
I agree with Polly, Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage seems like the best option for the architect's needs.
AN
Annabelle
2 years ago
Hmm, the key here is that the storage needs to be agnostic and support different types of storage. I think B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is the way to go.
KA
Kanisha
1 year ago
D) OpenStack Cinder could be a viable choice for the architect's needs as well.
BE
Bernardine
1 year ago
C) FlexVolume Drives might be worth considering for the persistent storage.
MA
Maile
1 year ago
I think A) HostPath Storage could also be a good option for the architect.
LA
Lashon
1 year ago
I agree, B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is a good choice for agnostic storage.
PO
Polly
2 years ago
I think the architect should choose Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage because it supports all types of storage and can be used in hybrid clouds.
ED
Eden
2 years ago
I'm not sure, I think HostPath Storage could also be a good choice for the architect as it provides persistent storage and is easy to set up.
TE
Telma
2 years ago
I agree with Adria, Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage seems like the best option for the architect's needs.
AD
Adria
2 years ago
I think the architect should choose Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage because it supports all types of storage and can be used in hybrid clouds.