IBM C1000-147 Exam - Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-147 exam

Question #: 14
Topic #: 6

An architect needs an agnostic provider of persistent storage for their OpenShift Container Platform, that supports file, block, and object storage, either in-house or in hybrid clouds, Which provider should the architect choose?

AHostPath Storage

BRed Hat OpenShift Container Storage

CFlexVolume Drives

DOpenStack Cinder

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Willow at Jul 29, 2023, 02:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-147 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Xochitl

3 months ago

Wait, can it really handle all three types of storage? That’s impressive!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

3 months ago

OpenStack Cinder could work, but it might be overkill for some setups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

4 months ago

Not sure about HostPath Storage, seems too limited for hybrid clouds.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

4 months ago

Definitely agree with that! It supports all types of storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karan

4 months ago

I think Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bok

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards D, OpenStack Cinder, but I’m not confident it supports all those storage types as well as the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

An

4 months ago

I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, and it was about choosing a storage solution that integrates well with Kubernetes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about FlexVolume Drives being more limited in functionality compared to other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerilyn

5 months ago

I think the answer might be B, Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage, since it’s designed for OpenShift and supports multiple storage types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

5 months ago

I've seen this type of issue before. My guess is that LTM-B is the device eligible to initiate the config-sync, so that's likely the reason it's failing on LTM-D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carisa

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements for the campus and branch sites seem straightforward, but I'll need to do some quick calculations to figure out the best CIDR block sizes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eliseo

10 months ago

I bet the architect is just itching to get this right - they don't want to end up in a storage pickle, do they?

upvoted 0 times

Diego

8 months ago

I'm not sure about this one, maybe the architect should research more before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hillary

8 months ago

C) FlexVolume Drives

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

8 months ago

Hmm, that could be a good choice for hybrid cloud storage, worth looking into.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

8 months ago

D) OpenStack Cinder

upvoted 0 times

...

Pura

8 months ago

I think the architect should consider this option too, it might fit their requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valene

8 months ago

A) HostPath Storage

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

8 months ago

That's a solid choice, it offers the flexibility and support the architect needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgie

8 months ago

B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage

upvoted 0 times

...

Donette

9 months ago

C) FlexVolume Drives could provide the flexibility the architect is looking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

9 months ago

D) OpenStack Cinder might be worth considering as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

9 months ago

A) HostPath Storage could also be a good option for their needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

9 months ago

B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage would be the best choice for the architect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celeste

10 months ago

I heard Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is pretty robust and can handle a variety of storage needs. Sounds like the perfect solution for this architect's requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glen

10 months ago

OpenStack Cinder is an interesting choice, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit for an OpenShift environment. B) seems like the safer bet.

upvoted 0 times

Tricia

9 months ago

I agree, B) seems like the safer bet for an OpenShift environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tricia

9 months ago

B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

10 months ago

I'm not sure about the HostPath Storage or FlexVolume Drives options. They don't seem to fit the requirement of being agnostic and supporting multiple storage types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margart

10 months ago

I'm not sure, I think HostPath Storage could also be a good choice for in-house storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sean

11 months ago

I agree with Polly, Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage seems like the best option for the architect's needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

11 months ago

Hmm, the key here is that the storage needs to be agnostic and support different types of storage. I think B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times