Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-147 Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-147 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 6
[All C1000-147 Questions]

An architect needs an agnostic provider of persistent storage for their OpenShift Container Platform, that supports file, block, and object storage, either in-house or in hybrid clouds, Which provider should the architect choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Willow at Jul 29, 2023, 02:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-147 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Eliseo
1 months ago
I bet the architect is just itching to get this right - they don't want to end up in a storage pickle, do they?
upvoted 0 times
Detra
13 hours ago
A) HostPath Storage could also be a good option for their needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 days ago
B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage would be the best choice for the architect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celeste
2 months ago
I heard Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is pretty robust and can handle a variety of storage needs. Sounds like the perfect solution for this architect's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
2 months ago
OpenStack Cinder is an interesting choice, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit for an OpenShift environment. B) seems like the safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
Tricia
17 days ago
I agree, B) seems like the safer bet for an OpenShift environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
18 days ago
B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raylene
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the HostPath Storage or FlexVolume Drives options. They don't seem to fit the requirement of being agnostic and supporting multiple storage types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
2 months ago
I'm not sure, I think HostPath Storage could also be a good choice for in-house storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
2 months ago
I agree with Polly, Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage seems like the best option for the architect's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
2 months ago
Hmm, the key here is that the storage needs to be agnostic and support different types of storage. I think B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Kanisha
5 days ago
D) OpenStack Cinder could be a viable choice for the architect's needs as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
5 days ago
C) FlexVolume Drives might be worth considering for the persistent storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
6 days ago
I think A) HostPath Storage could also be a good option for the architect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
1 months ago
I agree, B) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage is a good choice for agnostic storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Polly
2 months ago
I think the architect should choose Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage because it supports all types of storage and can be used in hybrid clouds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 months ago
I'm not sure, I think HostPath Storage could also be a good choice for the architect as it provides persistent storage and is easy to set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
2 months ago
I agree with Adria, Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage seems like the best option for the architect's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
2 months ago
I think the architect should choose Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage because it supports all types of storage and can be used in hybrid clouds.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel