Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-147 Exam - Topic 15 Question 48 Discussion

Application owned asynchronous capabilities, like messaging and events, must exhibit which features to align to agile integration paradigm?
A) Simple deployment topology for high availability configuration
B) Ability to convert message to events and vice versa
C) Self-provisioning and self-administration capability to allow development agility
D) Common collection of logs across several instances for rapid administration

IBM C1000-147 Exam - Topic 15 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-147 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 15
[All C1000-147 Questions]

Application owned asynchronous capabilities, like messaging and events, must exhibit which features to align to agile integration paradigm?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Amber at Jan 22, 2025, 02:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-147 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Daren
9 months ago
Not sure about the common logs thing, seems tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
9 months ago
Wait, can we really achieve all that in one app?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
10 months ago
High availability is a must, can't argue with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
King
10 months ago
I think converting messages to events is crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
10 months ago
Definitely need self-provisioning for agility!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
10 months ago
Option D seems important too, especially for rapid administration, but I can't recall if it was specifically tied to the agile integration paradigm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A since high availability is often emphasized in agile environments, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
11 months ago
I remember a practice question about messaging systems, and I feel like the ability to convert messages to events is crucial, so maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
11 months ago
I think option C sounds right because self-provisioning can really help with development speed, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
11 months ago
Alright, let's see here. I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is B - the ability to convert messages to events and vice versa. That kind of flexibility and interoperability seems essential for the asynchronous, event-driven nature of an agile integration architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is looking for features that enable flexibility, scalability, and self-service for the development team. I'm leaning towards option C, as the ability to self-provision and self-administer seems like it would be crucial in an agile environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure what the "agile integration paradigm" is referring to, so I'll need to think through the different options and try to infer the most relevant features. Maybe I can eliminate a few choices that don't seem as directly related.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
11 months ago
This question seems to be testing our understanding of the features required for asynchronous capabilities in an agile integration paradigm. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think about which ones best align with the key principles of agility and integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 years ago
Actually, I believe the correct answer is B. The ability to convert message to events and vice versa is essential for aligning with agile integration paradigm.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 years ago
C all the way, baby! Self-provisioning and self-administration is the secret sauce that makes agile integration as spicy as a Carolina Reaper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
2 years ago
I agree with Shenika, self-provisioning and self-administration capability is crucial for agile integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
2 years ago
A? Seriously? High availability, what is this, the 90s? We want our apps to be as fragile as a house of cards in a hurricane, just like the agile gods intended.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
2 years ago
C) Self-provisioning and self-administration capability to allow development agility
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 years ago
B) Ability to convert message to events and vice versa
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
2 years ago
D might be useful, but common logs? Nah, I want my logs to be a mystery, like a treasure hunt every time I need to troubleshoot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
2 years ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
2 years ago
B is the answer, gotta have that ability to convert messages to events and back. It's like a secret handshake for the agile integration club.
upvoted 0 times
Aracelis
2 years ago
Definitely, it's like the key to unlocking the full potential of the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
2 years ago
I agree, being able to convert messages to events is crucial for agile integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elli
2 years ago
C is the way to go! Self-provisioning and self-administration is key for agile integration, am I right or am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Brittney
2 years ago
Agreed, C is definitely a crucial feature for aligning with the agile integration paradigm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
2 years ago
Definitely! It allows for development agility and makes the process much smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
2 years ago
Yes, you are absolutely right! Self-provisioning and self-administration are essential for agile integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel