MENU
Which would be a valid architectural decision when using the Cloud Pak for Integration for a multi-cloud design goal?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium C1000-147 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
MA
Matilda
11 months ago
Definitely B, AWS and IBM Cloud are a great combo!
AN
Angelo
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure D is necessary? Seems excessive.
JU
Julieta
11 months ago
C makes sense for security, totally agree!
BE
Belen
11 months ago
I think A could work too, but not as flexible.
CR
Crista
12 months ago
B is a solid choice for multi-cloud.
AN
Andrew
12 months ago
I definitely remember that multi-cloud strategies often involve using different providers, so option B could be the right answer, but I’m not completely confident.
RA
Raina
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences between master and proxy nodes. I feel like option D could be relevant, but I need to think it through more.
DA
Dahlia
1 year ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that placing nodes in separate subnets can enhance security, which might make option C valid.
CY
Cyndy
1 year ago
I remember discussing the importance of deploying across multiple clouds, so option B seems like a good choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
WA
Wava
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option B. Deploying the Cloud Pak for Integration on both IBM Cloud and AWS would give us the flexibility and redundancy we need for a multi-cloud environment.
AL
Alberto
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Placing the proxy or master nodes in separate subnets seems like it could be a valid option, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for a multi-cloud setup.
DY
Dyan
1 year ago
Ah, I think I've got it. Deploying the Cloud Pak for Integration on multiple cloud platforms like IBM Cloud and AWS would be a good way to achieve the multi-cloud design goal.
LA
Lanie
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about a valid architectural decision, so I'll need to consider the different deployment options and how they align with a multi-cloud strategy.
KA
Kara
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the multi-cloud design goal and the capabilities of the Cloud Pak for Integration.
LA
Launa
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Let me think through the definition of net working capital again to make sure I have it right.
ME
Mee
1 year ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward question. The iteration terminal should return the number of times the loop has executed, so I'm going with option A.
CH
Cheryll
1 year ago
Pretty sure it's Tux. There was a practice question about it, and I was confident then!
EL
Elizabeth
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure which method is wrong, but I'll probably start by trying the VNC login, since that seems like the most straightforward approach. Hopefully that'll give me a clue as to where the issue might be.
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
Option A is a safe bet, sticking to IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry seems like the most straightforward choice.
AB
Abel
1 year ago
C) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration proxy nodes in separate subnets
CA
Carmen
1 year ago
B) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services
LO
Lonna
1 year ago
A) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry
TE
Teri
1 year ago
Haha, Option D sounds like they're trying to hide the master nodes from each other. 'Separate subnets? More like separate planets!'
DE
Dexter
1 year ago
D) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration master nodes in separate subnets
NI
Nina
1 year ago
C) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration proxy nodes in separate subnets
AU
Audra
1 year ago
B) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services
AN
Annice
1 year ago
A) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry
KI
Kimbery
1 year ago
I'd go with Option B. Having the Cloud Pak on both IBM Cloud and AWS gives you more flexibility across cloud providers.
WI
Willow
1 year ago
User 2
KI
Kimbery
1 year ago
User 1
RE
Refugia
1 year ago
I prefer option B because deploying on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services offers a wider range of cloud services and resources.
JO
Josphine
2 years ago
I agree with Lezlie. Option A provides flexibility and scalability by leveraging multiple cloud platforms.
EL
Elenor
2 years ago
Option C looks good, separating the proxy nodes makes sense for a multi-cloud setup.
TI
Timothy
1 year ago
Separating the proxy nodes can help with scalability and performance.
LI
Lisbeth
1 year ago
It's important to consider the architecture when using Cloud Pak for Integration.
WI
Winfred
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice for a multi-cloud design goal.
PA
Paz
1 year ago
I agree, separating the proxy nodes in separate subnets is a good idea.
LE
Lezlie
2 years ago
I think option A is a valid architectural decision because it allows for deployment on both IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry.