New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-147 Exam - Topic 14 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-147 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 14
[All C1000-147 Questions]

Which would be a valid architectural decision when using the Cloud Pak for Integration for a multi-cloud design goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kris at Sep 01, 2023, 02:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-147 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Matilda
3 months ago
Definitely B, AWS and IBM Cloud are a great combo!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure D is necessary? Seems excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
4 months ago
C makes sense for security, totally agree!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
4 months ago
I think A could work too, but not as flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
4 months ago
B is a solid choice for multi-cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
4 months ago
I definitely remember that multi-cloud strategies often involve using different providers, so option B could be the right answer, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences between master and proxy nodes. I feel like option D could be relevant, but I need to think it through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
5 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that placing nodes in separate subnets can enhance security, which might make option C valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of deploying across multiple clouds, so option B seems like a good choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option B. Deploying the Cloud Pak for Integration on both IBM Cloud and AWS would give us the flexibility and redundancy we need for a multi-cloud environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Placing the proxy or master nodes in separate subnets seems like it could be a valid option, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for a multi-cloud setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
5 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. Deploying the Cloud Pak for Integration on multiple cloud platforms like IBM Cloud and AWS would be a good way to achieve the multi-cloud design goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about a valid architectural decision, so I'll need to consider the different deployment options and how they align with a multi-cloud strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the multi-cloud design goal and the capabilities of the Cloud Pak for Integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Let me think through the definition of net working capital again to make sure I have it right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
5 months ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward question. The iteration terminal should return the number of times the loop has executed, so I'm going with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
5 months ago
Pretty sure it's Tux. There was a practice question about it, and I was confident then!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure which method is wrong, but I'll probably start by trying the VNC login, since that seems like the most straightforward approach. Hopefully that'll give me a clue as to where the issue might be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
10 months ago
Option A is a safe bet, sticking to IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry seems like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
Abel
9 months ago
C) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration proxy nodes in separate subnets
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
9 months ago
B) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
9 months ago
A) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
10 months ago
Haha, Option D sounds like they're trying to hide the master nodes from each other. 'Separate subnets? More like separate planets!'
upvoted 0 times
Dexter
8 months ago
D) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration master nodes in separate subnets
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
8 months ago
C) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration proxy nodes in separate subnets
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
8 months ago
B) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
9 months ago
A) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
10 months ago
I'd go with Option B. Having the Cloud Pak on both IBM Cloud and AWS gives you more flexibility across cloud providers.
upvoted 0 times
Willow
10 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Refugia
10 months ago
I prefer option B because deploying on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services offers a wider range of cloud services and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
11 months ago
I agree with Lezlie. Option A provides flexibility and scalability by leveraging multiple cloud platforms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
11 months ago
Option C looks good, separating the proxy nodes makes sense for a multi-cloud setup.
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
9 months ago
Separating the proxy nodes can help with scalability and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
10 months ago
It's important to consider the architecture when using Cloud Pak for Integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
10 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for a multi-cloud design goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
10 months ago
I agree, separating the proxy nodes in separate subnets is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
11 months ago
I think option A is a valid architectural decision because it allows for deployment on both IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel