Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-147 Exam - Topic 14 Question 16 Discussion

Which would be a valid architectural decision when using the Cloud Pak for Integration for a multi-cloud design goal?
B) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services
A) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry
C) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration proxy nodes in separate subnets
D) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration master nodes in separate subnets

IBM C1000-147 Exam - Topic 14 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-147 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 14
[All C1000-147 Questions]

Which would be a valid architectural decision when using the Cloud Pak for Integration for a multi-cloud design goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kris at Sep 01, 2023, 02:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-147 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Matilda
8 months ago
Definitely B, AWS and IBM Cloud are a great combo!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure D is necessary? Seems excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
8 months ago
C makes sense for security, totally agree!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
9 months ago
I think A could work too, but not as flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
9 months ago
B is a solid choice for multi-cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
9 months ago
I definitely remember that multi-cloud strategies often involve using different providers, so option B could be the right answer, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences between master and proxy nodes. I feel like option D could be relevant, but I need to think it through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
9 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that placing nodes in separate subnets can enhance security, which might make option C valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
9 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of deploying across multiple clouds, so option B seems like a good choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option B. Deploying the Cloud Pak for Integration on both IBM Cloud and AWS would give us the flexibility and redundancy we need for a multi-cloud environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
9 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Placing the proxy or master nodes in separate subnets seems like it could be a valid option, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for a multi-cloud setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
9 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. Deploying the Cloud Pak for Integration on multiple cloud platforms like IBM Cloud and AWS would be a good way to achieve the multi-cloud design goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
9 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about a valid architectural decision, so I'll need to consider the different deployment options and how they align with a multi-cloud strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
9 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the multi-cloud design goal and the capabilities of the Cloud Pak for Integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Let me think through the definition of net working capital again to make sure I have it right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
10 months ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward question. The iteration terminal should return the number of times the loop has executed, so I'm going with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
10 months ago
Pretty sure it's Tux. There was a practice question about it, and I was confident then!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
10 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure which method is wrong, but I'll probably start by trying the VNC login, since that seems like the most straightforward approach. Hopefully that'll give me a clue as to where the issue might be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
Option A is a safe bet, sticking to IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry seems like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
Abel
1 year ago
C) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration proxy nodes in separate subnets
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
1 year ago
B) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
1 year ago
A) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
1 year ago
Haha, Option D sounds like they're trying to hide the master nodes from each other. 'Separate subnets? More like separate planets!'
upvoted 0 times
Dexter
1 year ago
D) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration master nodes in separate subnets
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
1 year ago
C) Place the Cloud Pak for Integration proxy nodes in separate subnets
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 year ago
B) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
A) Deploy the Cloud Pak for Integration on IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
I'd go with Option B. Having the Cloud Pak on both IBM Cloud and AWS gives you more flexibility across cloud providers.
upvoted 0 times
Willow
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Refugia
1 year ago
I prefer option B because deploying on IBM Cloud and Amazon Web Services offers a wider range of cloud services and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
1 year ago
I agree with Lezlie. Option A provides flexibility and scalability by leveraging multiple cloud platforms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
1 year ago
Option C looks good, separating the proxy nodes makes sense for a multi-cloud setup.
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
1 year ago
Separating the proxy nodes can help with scalability and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
1 year ago
It's important to consider the architecture when using Cloud Pak for Integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice for a multi-cloud design goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
1 year ago
I agree, separating the proxy nodes in separate subnets is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
1 year ago
I think option A is a valid architectural decision because it allows for deployment on both IBM Cloud and Cloud Foundry.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel