Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM C1000-147 Exam - Topic 12 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-147 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 12
[All C1000-147 Questions]

Which of the following maximizes durability by replicating message data into three availability zones, making Event Streams resilient to infrastructure failures?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lashawnda
21 days ago
I feel D) Multi-zone architecture is the most effective for resilience. Makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
26 days ago
I’m leaning towards B) Triplewrite logging. It seems reliable for data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
1 month ago
I agree, D) Multi-zone architecture is the best choice. Redundancy is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 month ago
I think it's D) Multi-zone architecture. It sounds robust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 month ago
I’m not so sure about D) Multi-zone architecture… sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
2 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
2 months ago
A) Geo-datasync is cool, but not the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
2 months ago
I thought it was B) Triplewrite logging?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
2 months ago
Definitely D) Multi-zone architecture!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
Haha, "Triplewrite logging" - sounds like a bad case of writer's cramp to me! I'm going with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
2 months ago
D) Multi-zone architecture is the way to go. Spread that data out like peanut butter on toast!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
3 months ago
I'd go with B) Triplewrite logging. Sounds like it does the job, and who doesn't love a bit of triple-writing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
3 months ago
Definitely D. Gotta have that multi-zone redundancy to keep those messages flowing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
3 months ago
D) Multi-zone architecture is the correct answer. It replicates data across three availability zones for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
4 months ago
I’m confused between A) Geo-datasync and D) Multi-zone architecture. They both seem relevant to data resilience, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
4 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and I think it was about how data is replicated across zones. Could it be D) Multi-zone architecture?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about B) Triplewrite logging being related to data durability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
4 months ago
I think the answer might be D) Multi-zone architecture since it sounds like it involves multiple locations for data storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
4 months ago
I'm a bit lost on the details of these AWS services. But the question is clearly asking about replicating data, so I'll eliminate the options that don't seem to be about that. I'll take a guess at B) or D).
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
I've seen multi-zone architectures used for this kind of resilience before. I'm pretty confident that's the right approach, so I'll go with D) on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Replicating data across zones, that makes sense. I'm guessing either D) Multi-zone architecture or B) Triplewrite logging would be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know replication is important for durability, but I'm not familiar with all these specific AWS services. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
5 months ago
I think the key here is looking for the option that replicates the data across multiple availability zones. That sounds like the best way to maximize durability and resilience.
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
16 days ago
I agree! Multi-zone architecture seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel