New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-142 Exam - Topic 2 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-142 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 2
[All C1000-142 Questions]

An application is comprised of a set of core functions such as product catalog, client ratings, user forums, and each function must be developed and deployed independently of each other. Which architecture supports this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Magnolia at Jan 15, 2025, 04:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-142 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rodrigo
3 months ago
Surprised that people still think monolithic is a good option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
3 months ago
Platform-as-a-service could work, but not as flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
4 months ago
Wait, isn't monolithic easier for small apps?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
4 months ago
I agree, microservices are the way to go for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
4 months ago
Definitely microservices, they allow independent deployment!
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
4 months ago
I have a vague recollection that platform-as-a-service is more about hosting than architecture style. I’m leaning towards microservices too, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
5 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced on microservices versus monolithic architectures. I feel like microservices is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the Fowler architecture is more about patterns rather than deployment independence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
5 months ago
I remember we discussed microservices in class, and how they allow independent deployment of functions. I think that might be the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
5 months ago
Microservices is the way to go here. The ability to develop and deploy each core function independently is a key characteristic of a microservices architecture. I'm confident this is the right solution for the given requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The application needs to be broken down into independently developed and deployed components. That sounds like a microservices architecture to me. I'll make sure to explain the benefits of that approach in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions "core functions" which makes me think a monolithic approach could work, but the independent deployment requirement seems to point more towards microservices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
5 months ago
This sounds like a classic microservices architecture question. I'll focus on understanding the key requirements around independent development and deployment of core functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
10 months ago
If I had a dollar for every time I heard 'Microservices' in an interview, I'd be a rich person.
upvoted 0 times
Lottie
8 months ago
C: Platform-as-a-service could also work well for independent deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
9 months ago
B: I agree, it seems to be a popular choice for scalable applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
9 months ago
A: Microservices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
10 months ago
Ooh, Fowler? Is that like a new type of bird I haven't heard of before?
upvoted 0 times
Louis
9 months ago
C: Platform-as-a-service is another option, but not the best fit for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
9 months ago
B: Microservices is the architecture that supports developing and deploying functions independently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
10 months ago
A: No, Fowler is not a type of bird. It's actually a software architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Patria
10 months ago
Platform-as-a-service? Nah, that's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
upvoted 0 times
Charlene
9 months ago
C: Monolithic
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
10 months ago
B: Definitely not Platform-as-a-service
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
10 months ago
A: Microservices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Makeda
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if a monolithic architecture would cut it here. Seems a bit too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Microservices make sense for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
11 months ago
Microservices all the way! Gotta love that independence and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
10 months ago
Definitely, it makes everything so much easier to manage and scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
10 months ago
I agree, microservices are the way to go for independent development and deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitzie
11 months ago
I agree with Tammara, Microservices allow for independent development and deployment of core functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Microservices.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel