Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-140 Topic 10 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-140 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 10
[All C1000-140 Questions]

What does QRadar attempt to do when the system generates ''Accumulator is falling behind'' warnings?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Stephanie at Sep 16, 2024, 03:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-140 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rasheeda
23 days ago
QRadar's solution to the 'Accumulator is falling behind' issue? Throw a tarp over the problem and hope no one notices. It's the IT equivalent of putting a sock on the doorknob.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
24 days ago
D is the answer. Time-series graphs and reports omitting columns? Sounds like a clever way for QRadar to hide its shortcomings from the user. Classic IT move!
upvoted 0 times
Vanna
3 days ago
I think D is the correct answer. It does seem like a way for QRadar to cover up its issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
17 days ago
Yeah, it's like sweeping the problem under the rug.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
19 days ago
I think D is correct. It does seem like a way to cover up the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chantell
1 months ago
I'm going with C. The 'Accumulator is falling behind' warning means the events are being stored, not processed in real-time. That's the only way to explain the warning message.
upvoted 0 times
Eun
4 days ago
I disagree, I believe B is the right choice. QRadar automatically drops the incoming events and flows during that time period.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
9 days ago
I think A is the correct answer. QRadar tries to aggregate the events and flows during the next 60 seconds.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francine
1 months ago
B has to be the right answer. Automatically dropping the incoming events and flows is the only way QRadar can prevent the system from falling further behind. Aggregating data sounds too complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. QRadar tries to aggregate the events and flows during the next 60 seconds to catch up with the backlog. That seems like the most reasonable approach to handling the 'Accumulator is falling behind' warning.
upvoted 0 times
Asuncion
20 days ago
I think option B could also be a possibility. Automatically dropping incoming events and flows might help alleviate the backlog issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
24 days ago
I agree, option A makes sense. It's important for QRadar to catch up with the backlog of events and flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rory
2 months ago
I agree with Virgina, QRadar attempts to aggregate the events and flows to catch up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 months ago
I believe QRadar automatically drops the incoming events and flows during that time period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 months ago
I think QRadar tries to aggregate the events and flows during the next 60 seconds.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel