Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-116 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-116 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All C1000-116 Questions]

Why should a security proxy hierarchy be created in Case Builder?

Available Choices (select all choices that are correct)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Minna at Feb 12, 2024, 04:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-116 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Vernell
3 months ago
Wait, we're talking about security proxies, not security monkeys, right? I was about to suggest teaching them how to guard the case files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
3 months ago
I'm going with A, C, and D. Reusing case types, document access, and avoiding the security config - that's the ticket!
upvoted 0 times
Loreta
2 months ago
Avoiding reliance on Security Configuration can prevent potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
2 months ago
Accessing documents easily is crucial for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
I agree, reusing case types is definitely a time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincent
3 months ago
B is a bit strange. Changing security as cases get 'stale'? That's a new one on me.
upvoted 0 times
Bulah
2 months ago
C) To ensure that users can dynamically access documents filed in case folders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
3 months ago
A) To reuse case types between business units without sharing case data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
4 months ago
C is definitely correct. Being able to dynamically access documents is crucial for case management.
upvoted 0 times
Gracie
2 months ago
C) To ensure that users can dynamically access documents filed in case folders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
2 months ago
B) To dynamically change security on cases as the cases change stale
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
3 months ago
A) To reuse case types between business units without sharing case data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilma
4 months ago
A and D seem like the right choices here. Reusing case types and avoiding the security configuration sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Pamela
3 months ago
D) To avoid having to rely on the Security Configuration to handle case security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
3 months ago
A) To reuse case types between business units without sharing case data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
3 months ago
D) To avoid having to rely on the Security Configuration to handle case security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
3 months ago
A) To reuse case types between business units without sharing case data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fatima
4 months ago
I also think it's necessary to avoid relying solely on Security Configuration for case security. Having a hierarchy adds an extra layer of protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
4 months ago
I agree with Blair. It's important to have a hierarchy in place to manage access to sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
4 months ago
I think a security proxy hierarchy should be created to ensure that users can dynamically access documents filed in case folders.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel