New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM C1000-101 Exam - Topic 6 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-101 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 6
[All C1000-101 Questions]

A customer needs to easily adopt cloud-native design and development practices for new applications and their existing applications without cloud provider lock-in. Which solution should be recommended?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Danica
4 months ago
I disagree, Cloud Pak for Automation might be more versatile for existing apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
4 months ago
I’ve heard good things about IBM Cloud Pak for Data too, but not sure it fits this need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
4 months ago
Wait, can it really avoid vendor lock-in? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
4 months ago
Totally agree, it’s designed for that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
5 months ago
I think IBM Cloud Pak for Applications is the best choice for cloud-native practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
I feel like C is more about security, so it probably doesn't fit this question. I lean towards B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about choosing the right Cloud Pak for flexibility. Could it be D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about avoiding vendor lock-in. Maybe A could be relevant too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
I think the answer might be B, IBM Cloud Pak for Applications, since it focuses on modernizing apps and cloud-native practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'm debating between customer satisfaction metric and number of services purchased. Guess I'll have to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
5 months ago
I'm confident that the Scrum Master should not just declare the team "not ready for Scrum." That goes against the Scrum values of continuous improvement and adaptation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I remember something about using non-sequential sequence numbers, but I'm not sure if that's the best practice. I'll have to review my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on bank credit profile. I'll focus on understanding the key terms like "capital adequacy" and "slippage ratio" to determine which statements are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel