New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ISC2
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
IBM Discussions
C1000-065 Exam - Topic 8 Question 87 Discussion
IBM C1000-065 Exam - Topic 8 Question 87 Discussion
Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-065 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 8
[All C1000-065 Questions]
Which of the following can result in poor report performance?
A
reports with filters
B
models with outer joins and cross joins
C
queries with database only processing
D
an optimized metadata model
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
B
by
Jina
at
Jul 08, 2025, 03:22 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium C1000-065 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
0
/2000 characters
Submit
Cancel
Christiane
2 months ago
Wait, how can D be a problem? Isn’t optimized metadata supposed to help?
upvoted
0
times
...
Helga
2 months ago
C seems like a no-brainer, right? Database-only processing is usually slow.
upvoted
0
times
...
Pamella
3 months ago
I think A can slow things down too, especially with large datasets.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ayesha
3 months ago
Totally agree with B, outer and cross joins can really drag things down!
upvoted
0
times
...
Ozell
3 months ago
B is definitely a big issue for performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Nakisha
3 months ago
An optimized metadata model should improve performance, so I doubt that's the right choice.
upvoted
0
times
...
Irma
3 months ago
Queries with database-only processing sound familiar, but I can't recall if they always lead to poor performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Sue
4 months ago
I remember practicing with outer joins and cross joins causing performance hits in some scenarios. That might be the answer.
upvoted
0
times
...
Fredric
4 months ago
I think reports with filters could slow things down, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main issue.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kimberely
4 months ago
Tricky question, but I think I can narrow it down. I'll focus on the database-related factors that can impact report performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Deeanna
4 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. Filters and complex database operations are common culprits for slow reports.
upvoted
0
times
...
Hildegarde
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to identify which of these factors can lead to poor performance. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem relevant.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lynelle
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to review my notes on database queries and report design to figure this out.
upvoted
0
times
...
Audra
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different factors that can impact report performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mari
7 months ago
True, an optimized metadata model like D) can also help improve report performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rasheeda
7 months ago
I think queries with database only processing can be efficient if the database is properly optimized.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ariel
7 months ago
But what about C) queries with database only processing? Could that also impact report performance?
upvoted
0
times
...
Kathryn
7 months ago
Hold up, did someone say 'optimized metadata model'? Sounds like a surefire way to make your reports run at the speed of a snail on a treadmill!
upvoted
0
times
...
Theodora
7 months ago
Personally, I'm leaning towards option A. Reports with too many filters can really bog down the system.
upvoted
0
times
Gilma
7 months ago
I think models with outer joins and cross joins can also cause poor performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lyla
7 months ago
I think models with outer joins and cross joins can also impact performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Janna
7 months ago
I agree, reports with filters can definitely slow things down.
upvoted
0
times
...
Reuben
7 months ago
I agree, reports with filters can definitely slow things down.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Fairy
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. I was thinking option C might be the right choice - queries with database-only processing could also lead to poor performance.
upvoted
0
times
Julieta
7 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure, I was leaning towards option D - an optimized metadata model should help improve performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jospeh
7 months ago
User 2: I agree with you, Jospeh. Those types of joins can really slow down a report.
upvoted
0
times
...
Milly
8 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the correct choice - models with outer joins and cross joins can definitely impact performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Carma
8 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Outer joins and cross joins can definitely slow down report performance.
upvoted
0
times
Kristian
7 months ago
Having an optimized metadata model, like option D, can help improve report performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rosendo
7 months ago
Reports with filters can also impact performance, so option A is important to consider.
upvoted
0
times
...
Janna
8 months ago
I agree, option B is a common cause of poor report performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Mari
8 months ago
I agree with Rasheeda. Outer joins and cross joins can slow down the query processing.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rasheeda
8 months ago
I think B) models with outer joins and cross joins can result in poor report performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Christiane
2 months agoHelga
2 months agoPamella
3 months agoAyesha
3 months agoOzell
3 months agoNakisha
3 months agoIrma
3 months agoSue
4 months agoFredric
4 months agoKimberely
4 months agoDeeanna
4 months agoHildegarde
5 months agoLynelle
5 months agoAudra
5 months agoMari
7 months agoRasheeda
7 months agoAriel
7 months agoKathryn
7 months agoTheodora
7 months agoGilma
7 months agoLyla
7 months agoJanna
7 months agoReuben
7 months agoFairy
8 months agoJulieta
7 months agoJospeh
7 months agoMilly
8 months agoCarma
8 months agoKristian
7 months agoRosendo
7 months agoJanna
8 months agoMari
8 months agoRasheeda
8 months ago