U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-065 Exam - Topic 7 Question 34 Discussion

When using an OLAP data source, summaries that use 'For' clauses give incorrect results. Which best describes the reason for this?
C) The 'For' clause does not generate incorrect summaries.
A) Time state rollups against OLAP data sources are not supported
B) OLAP data sources do not have detail rows
D) Incorporating context filters using MDX functions is not supported.

IBM C1000-065 Exam - Topic 7 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-065 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 7
[All C1000-065 Questions]

When using an OLAP data source, summaries that use 'For' clauses give incorrect results. Which best describes the reason for this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Filiberto at May 03, 2022, 06:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-065 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jesus
8 months ago
Time state rollups not supported? That's a bummer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
8 months ago
I think the 'For' clause can work sometimes, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
8 months ago
Totally agree, option B is spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
8 months ago
OLAP data sources don't have detail rows, that's a fact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
9 months ago
I vaguely remember something about context filters and MDX functions, but I’m uncertain if that relates directly to the 'For' clause issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
9 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where it mentioned that OLAP sources lack detail rows, which might be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
9 months ago
I remember something about OLAP not supporting certain rollups, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about 'For' clauses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the 'For' clause itself doesn't cause incorrect summaries, but I can't recall the exact reason why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
9 months ago
This seems like a good opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of FSC. I think option B, using Process Builder, could be a solid approach to summarize the data at the Person Account level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
9 months ago
I think the taxable profit should include the adjustments from previous years. Could it be $100,000? That sounds plausible, but I really need to double-check my calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel