New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM C1000-065 Exam - Topic 7 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-065 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 7
[All C1000-065 Questions]

When using an OLAP data source, summaries that use 'For' clauses give incorrect results. Which best describes the reason for this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jesus
4 months ago
Time state rollups not supported? That's a bummer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
4 months ago
I think the 'For' clause can work sometimes, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
4 months ago
Totally agree, option B is spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
5 months ago
OLAP data sources don't have detail rows, that's a fact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
5 months ago
I vaguely remember something about context filters and MDX functions, but I’m uncertain if that relates directly to the 'For' clause issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
5 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where it mentioned that OLAP sources lack detail rows, which might be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
5 months ago
I remember something about OLAP not supporting certain rollups, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about 'For' clauses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the 'For' clause itself doesn't cause incorrect summaries, but I can't recall the exact reason why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
5 months ago
This seems like a good opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of FSC. I think option B, using Process Builder, could be a solid approach to summarize the data at the Person Account level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
5 months ago
I think the taxable profit should include the adjustments from previous years. Could it be $100,000? That sounds plausible, but I really need to double-check my calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel