IASSC ICYB Exam - Topic 6 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for IASSC's ICYB exam

Question #: 97
Topic #: 6

[All ICYB Questions]

The following Business Case is constructed properly. ''During most of 2008 Division 16 experienced a 4.2% product return rate versus a target of nearly no returns. This costs the company a whole bunch of money.

ATrue

BFalse

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Sue at Nov 20, 2025, 02:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ICYB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jani

15 days ago

Really? A 4.2% return rate seems kinda normal for some products.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

21 days ago

Wait, how much money are we talking about?

upvoted 0 times

...

Olen

26 days ago

Totally agree, that’s not good at all!

upvoted 0 times

...

Walton

1 month ago

That's a pretty high return rate for a business.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glynda

1 month ago

True. Sounds like Division 16 needs to get their act together and stop losing the company a "whole bunch of money."

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

1 month ago

False. The business case is too vague and doesn't provide enough information to determine if it's properly constructed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

2 months ago

False. The business case lacks details on the specific costs and the root cause of the high return rate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

2 months ago

I’m confused about the wording. "A whole bunch of money" feels vague, but I guess if returns are high, it could definitely be true.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

2 months ago

This sounds familiar! I feel like we discussed how even a small percentage can lead to big costs, so I lean towards true.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

2 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a similar question where we had to analyze return rates. It might be false if they consider "nearly no returns" as acceptable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

2 months ago

This one's got me a bit confused. The wording about "a whole bunch of money" is kind of ambiguous. I'll need to make sure I really understand the financial implications of the return rate before selecting an answer. Gotta be careful on these tricky business cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

2 months ago

Okay, let's break this down. The question states the return rate was 4.2%, which is higher than the "nearly no returns" target. So I'm guessing the correct answer is True, since the high return rate would likely cost the company a significant amount of money. Seems pretty straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dante

3 months ago

I think the statement is true because a 4.2% return rate seems significant compared to the target of nearly no returns.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

3 months ago

True. The business case clearly states the problem and the impact on the company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Velda

3 months ago

I lean towards true. Returns are costly, that's clear.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

3 months ago

True. 4.2% is a pretty high return rate, and it's costing the company a lot of money.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darnell

4 months ago

Hmm, not sure about this one. The wording is a bit vague - what exactly does "a whole bunch of money" mean? I'll need to think this through carefully to make sure I don't miss any important nuances.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

4 months ago

I think I can handle this one. The key is to focus on the specific details provided in the question - the 4.2% return rate and the target of "nearly no returns." Seems pretty straightforward to determine if the statement is true or false.

upvoted 0 times

Phung

3 months ago

I agree, the return rate is clearly too high.

upvoted 0 times

...