Following process modifications, the Null Hypothesis states that no improvement to the process has occurred. If we discover the Null Hypothesis Test was rejected when it was false that would be a(n) _______________.
Following process modifications, the Null Hypothesis states that no improvement to the process has occurred. If we discover the Null Hypothesis Test was rejected when it was false that would be a(n) _______________.
I remember practicing questions about Type I and Type II errors, but I'm not sure which one this is. I think it might be Type I since we rejected the null.
Okay, I'm feeling good about this one. The key is understanding that a Type I error is when you reject the null hypothesis when it's actually true. But in this case, the question says the null is false, so rejecting it would be a Type I error. Nice, I'm ready to mark my answer.
Let me see if I can break this down step-by-step. The null hypothesis states that no improvement has occurred. If we reject that null when it's actually false, meaning an improvement did occur, that would be incorrectly identifying an effect. That's the definition of a Type I error. Okay, I think I've got it now.
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer here is Type I error. The question is specifically asking about rejecting the null hypothesis when it's false, which matches the definition of a Type I error.
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. Is it possible that rejecting the null when it's false could be a Type II error instead? I'll have to think this through carefully.
Bea
9 months agoAntonio
9 months agoKristel
9 months agoKara
9 months agoLettie
9 months agoShawana
10 months agoEarleen
10 months agoLeigha
10 months agoMitzie
10 months agoLatanya
11 months agoKimberlie
11 months agoTayna
11 months agoTrinidad
11 months agoFanny
11 months ago