In a good Measurement System the most variation will be with part-to-part measurements. What should you do if the majority of variation is associated with the Gage R&R assuming the gage is technically capable?
Option D: Run another MSA test, but this time with the machine blindfolded and one hand tied behind its back. That'll really give you some variation to work with!
I bet the correct answer is C. Focusing on trimming the Part-to-Part variation is the way to go. That's the whole point of a good measurement system, right?
Hmm, I'm not sure. Purchasing a new machine (B) seems like overkill. And running another MSA test (D) doesn't really fix the problem, it just gives you more data.
I think the answer is A. Focusing on the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device is the best way to address the issue if the majority of variation is in the Gage R&R.
User 1: I think the answer is A. Focusing on the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device is the best way to address the issue if the majority of variation is in the Gage R&R.
Tyra
27 days agoMitsue
Aliza
9 days agoLinn
1 months agoEric
13 days agoAudry
18 days agoRessie
1 months agoCory
1 months agoNaomi
2 months agoIsadora
13 days agoLizbeth
1 months agoQueen
2 months agoSusana
2 months agoCherelle
2 months ago