Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IASSC ICBB Exam - Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for IASSC's ICBB exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 4
[All ICBB Questions]

In a good Measurement System the most variation will be with part-to-part measurements. What should you do if the majority of variation is associated with the Gage R&R assuming the gage is technically capable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Natalie at Oct 26, 2022, 02:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ICBB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Thaddeus
6 months ago
Running another MSA test sounds like a good plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure the gage is really capable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
6 months ago
I think trimming part-to-part variation is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
6 months ago
Totally agree, fixing repeatability is a must.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
6 months ago
Gage R&R is key for accuracy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
7 months ago
I vaguely recall that purchasing a new machine isn't usually the first step unless the gage is completely incapable. So, I guess option B is probably not the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
7 months ago
I feel like we did a similar practice question where we had to decide between fixing the gage or looking at the parts. I think running another MSA test could help clarify things, so maybe option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think we might need to look at the part-to-part variation instead. Maybe option C could be the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
7 months ago
I remember we discussed that if Gage R&R is high, we should focus on fixing the repeatability and reproducibility. So, I think option A makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions changes in accounting policies and correcting errors, so I'll need to think through the differences between the options carefully before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
7 months ago
The dynamic range number seemed pretty high to me. Is 160 dB realistic, or should that be the first thing to change?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
7 months ago
If I remember right, REST APIs heavily rely on HTTP, so I'm leaning towards option D. It feels like a safe bet!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
7 months ago
VRRP seems like the most likely answer here. It's a common redundancy protocol used for high availability, and it should work with IPsec.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
12 months ago
Option D: Run another MSA test, but this time with the machine blindfolded and one hand tied behind its back. That'll really give you some variation to work with!
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
11 months ago
A) Focus on fixing the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
C) Focus on trimming the Part-to-Part variation
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
11 months ago
A) Focus on fixing the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linn
12 months ago
A for sure. It's like the old saying, 'If the gage ain't right, you gotta fight.'
upvoted 0 times
Tasia
11 months ago
D) Run another MSA test with the machine
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
11 months ago
That's right, we need to make sure the gage is reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
11 months ago
A) Focus on fixing the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
12 months ago
I bet the correct answer is C. Focusing on trimming the Part-to-Part variation is the way to go. That's the whole point of a good measurement system, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Purchasing a new machine (B) seems like overkill. And running another MSA test (D) doesn't really fix the problem, it just gives you more data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. Focusing on the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device is the best way to address the issue if the majority of variation is in the Gage R&R.
upvoted 0 times
Isadora
11 months ago
User 2: That makes sense. It's important to ensure the measurement device is reliable and consistent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
12 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is A. Focusing on the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device is the best way to address the issue if the majority of variation is in the Gage R&R.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queen
1 year ago
D) Run another MSA test with the machine to confirm the results before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 year ago
I agree with Cherelle, focusing on fixing the gage R&R is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
A) Focus on fixing the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel