IASSC ICBB Exam - Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for IASSC's ICBB exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 4

[All ICBB Questions]

In a good Measurement System the most variation will be with part-to-part measurements. What should you do if the majority of variation is associated with the Gage R&R assuming the gage is technically capable?

AFocus on fixing the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device

BPurchase a new machine

CFocus on trimming the Part-to-Part variation

DRun another MSA test with the machine

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Natalie at Oct 26, 2022, 02:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ICBB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Thaddeus

4 months ago

Running another MSA test sounds like a good plan!

upvoted 0 times

...

Fredric

4 months ago

Wait, are we sure the gage is really capable?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marge

5 months ago

I think trimming part-to-part variation is more effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlena

5 months ago

Totally agree, fixing repeatability is a must.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janae

5 months ago

Gage R&R is key for accuracy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stacey

5 months ago

I vaguely recall that purchasing a new machine isn't usually the first step unless the gage is completely incapable. So, I guess option B is probably not the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

5 months ago

I feel like we did a similar practice question where we had to decide between fixing the gage or looking at the parts. I think running another MSA test could help clarify things, so maybe option D?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think we might need to look at the part-to-part variation instead. Maybe option C could be the right choice?

upvoted 0 times

...

Michell

5 months ago

I remember we discussed that if Gage R&R is high, we should focus on fixing the repeatability and reproducibility. So, I think option A makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shad

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions changes in accounting policies and correcting errors, so I'll need to think through the differences between the options carefully before selecting my answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

5 months ago

The dynamic range number seemed pretty high to me. Is 160 dB realistic, or should that be the first thing to change?

upvoted 0 times

...

Chuck

5 months ago

If I remember right, REST APIs heavily rely on HTTP, so I'm leaning towards option D. It feels like a safe bet!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyra

5 months ago

VRRP seems like the most likely answer here. It's a common redundancy protocol used for high availability, and it should work with IPsec.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyra

10 months ago

Option D: Run another MSA test, but this time with the machine blindfolded and one hand tied behind its back. That'll really give you some variation to work with!

upvoted 0 times

Cristy

9 months ago

A) Focus on fixing the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

9 months ago

C) Focus on trimming the Part-to-Part variation

upvoted 0 times

...

Aliza

10 months ago

A) Focus on fixing the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

10 months ago

A for sure. It's like the old saying, 'If the gage ain't right, you gotta fight.'

upvoted 0 times

Tasia

9 months ago

D) Run another MSA test with the machine

upvoted 0 times

...

Eric

10 months ago

That's right, we need to make sure the gage is reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audry

10 months ago

A) Focus on fixing the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

10 months ago

I bet the correct answer is C. Focusing on trimming the Part-to-Part variation is the way to go. That's the whole point of a good measurement system, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cory

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Purchasing a new machine (B) seems like overkill. And running another MSA test (D) doesn't really fix the problem, it just gives you more data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

11 months ago

I think the answer is A. Focusing on the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device is the best way to address the issue if the majority of variation is in the Gage R&R.

upvoted 0 times

Isadora

10 months ago

User 2: That makes sense. It's important to ensure the measurement device is reliable and consistent.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizbeth

10 months ago

User 1: I think the answer is A. Focusing on the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the measurement device is the best way to address the issue if the majority of variation is in the Gage R&R.

upvoted 0 times

...