New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP-E Exam - Topic 8 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 8
[All CIPP-E Questions]

Under the GDPR, who would be LEAST likely to be allowed to engage in the collection, use, and disclosure of a data subject's sensitive medical information without the data subject's knowledge or consent?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

According to the GDPR, the material scope of the regulation covers the processing of personal data wholly or partly by automated means, or by non-automated means if the data forms part of a filing system or is intended to form part of a filing system (Article 2(1)). Personal data is defined as any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (data subject) (Article 4(1)). An identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that natural person (Article 4(1)). Therefore, pseudonymous data, such as blockchain transactions that use public keys or other identifiers, may still fall within the definition of personal data if the data subject can be identified or re-identified by using additional information or means (Recital 26).

The GDPR also applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the European Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the European Union or not (Article 3(1)). The GDPR also applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the European Union by a controller or processor not established in the European Union, where the processing activities are related to the offering of goods or services to such data subjects in the European Union or the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the European Union (Article 3(2)). Therefore, the territorial scope of the GDPR covers both controllers and processors established in the European Union, and controllers and processors not established in the European Union but targeting or monitoring data subjects in the European Union.

In this scenario, blockchain transactions are classified as pseudonymous data, which may still be considered as personal data under the GDPR if the data subjects can be identified or re-identified. Therefore, such transactions are within the material scope of the GDPR, as they involve the processing of personal data by automated means. However, the GDPR only applies to such transactions to the extent that they include data subjects in the European Union, either by having a controller or processor established in the European Union, or by offering goods or services to or monitoring the behaviour of such data subjects. Therefore, the answer is C.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Marcelle
3 months ago
B is necessary for public health, so it makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
Wait, can journalists really publish sensitive info like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
4 months ago
A member of the judiciary has a right to that info, so A is fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
4 months ago
I think C might be okay if it's life-threatening.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
4 months ago
Definitely D, journalists shouldn't access that info without consent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
5 months ago
I feel like the judiciary might have some exceptions, but a journalist seems the least likely to get away with using sensitive medical info without consent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where health professionals had to act in the best interest of the patient. I think they might be allowed to share info without consent if it’s life-threatening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think public authorities might have some leeway in sharing information for public health reasons. It feels like a gray area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
5 months ago
I remember that under GDPR, consent is really important, especially for sensitive data. I think a journalist would definitely need consent to publish medical information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
5 months ago
Based on my understanding of the GDPR, a journalist writing an article would be the least likely to be allowed to collect and use sensitive medical information without the data subject's consent, as there is no clear legal or public health justification. The other options, such as a judge or health professional, may have stronger grounds to access the information under certain circumstances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
5 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. The key is to identify the option that is least likely to be allowed to collect and use this data without consent. I'll consider the different roles and scenarios presented and try to determine which one has the weakest justification for doing so.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the GDPR rules on sensitive medical information and the exceptions. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward GDPR question. I'll carefully review the options and choose the one that is least likely to be allowed to collect and use sensitive medical data without consent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one. I'm going to have to consult my GDPR cheat sheet before answering. *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
10 months ago
This question is making my head spin. Why can't they just let the doctors do their jobs without all this red tape? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
10 months ago
I bet the public authority (B) thinks they can do whatever they want for the 'greater good'. But the GDPR is pretty clear about consent, even for them.
upvoted 0 times
Shanda
9 months ago
C: Yeah, GDPR is strict about protecting data subjects' rights, no exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
9 months ago
B: But according to GDPR, even they need to have consent before sharing sensitive medical information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
9 months ago
A: I think you're right, the public authority (B) might try to justify it for public health reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharita
10 months ago
C seems like the clear answer to me. A health professional should be able to share information that could save a patient's life.
upvoted 0 times
Nu
9 months ago
C) A health professional involved in the medical care for the data subject, where the data subject's life hinges on the timely dissemination of such information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
10 months ago
B) A public authority responsible for public health, where the sharing of such information is considered necessary for the protection of the general populace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
10 months ago
A) A member of the judiciary involved in adjudicating a legal dispute involving the data subject and concerning the health of the data subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quinn
11 months ago
A journalist writing an article? Yeah, right. They'll use any excuse to get their hands on sensitive information. D is definitely the least likely to be allowed.
upvoted 0 times
Fidelia
9 months ago
C) A health professional involved in the medical care for the data subject, where the data subject's life hinges on the timely dissemination of such information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
10 months ago
B) A public authority responsible for public health, where the sharing of such information is considered necessary for the protection of the general populace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
A) A member of the judiciary involved in adjudicating a legal dispute involving the data subject and concerning the health of the data subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Billye
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to have to think carefully about the implications of the GDPR here.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
9 months ago
D) A journalist writing an article relating to the medical condition in QUESTION, who believes that the publication of such information is in the public interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
9 months ago
C) A health professional involved in the medical care for the data subject, where the data subject's life hinges on the timely dissemination of such information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
9 months ago
B) A public authority responsible for public health, where the sharing of such information is considered necessary for the protection of the general populace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
9 months ago
A) A member of the judiciary involved in adjudicating a legal dispute involving the data subject and concerning the health of the data subject.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamera
11 months ago
Because journalists need consent to publish sensitive medical information under GDPR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
11 months ago
Why do you think so, Tamera?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
11 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel