New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP-E Exam - Topic 7 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 7
[All CIPP-E Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next Question: 01

Louis, a long-time customer of Bedrock Insurance, was involved in a minor car accident a few months ago. Although no one was hurt, Louis has been plagued by texts and calls from a company called Accidentable offering to help him recover compensation for personal injury. Louis has heard about insurance companies selling customers' data to third parties, and he's convinced that Accidentable must have gotten his information from Bedrock Insurance.

Louis has also been receiving an increased amount of marketing information from Bedrock, trying to sell him their full range of their insurance policies.

Perturbed by this, Louis has started looking at price comparison sites on the internet and has been shocked to find that other insurers offer much cheaper rates than Bedrock, even though he has been a loyal customer for many years. When his Bedrock policy comes up for renewal, he decides to switch to Zantrum Insurance.

In order to activate his new insurance policy, Louis needs to supply Zantrum with information about his No Claims bonus, his vehicle and his driving history. After researching his rights under the GDPR, he writes to ask Bedrock to transfer his information directly to Zantrum. He also takes this opportunity to ask Bedrock to stop using his personal data for marketing purposes.

Bedrock supplies Louis with a PDF and XML (Extensible Markup Language) versions of his No Claims Certificate, but tells Louis it cannot transfer his data directly to Zantrum as this is not technically feasible. Bedrock also explains that Louis's contract included a provision whereby Louis agreed that his data could be used for marketing purposes; according to Bedrock, it is too late for Louis to change his mind about this. It angers Louis when he recalls the wording of the contract, which was filled with legal jargon and very confusing.

In the meantime, Louis is still receiving unwanted calls from Accidentable Insurance. He writes to Accidentable to ask for the name of the organization that supplied his details to them. He warns Accidentable that he plans to complain to the data protection authority, because he thinks their company has been using his data unlawfully. His letter states that he does not want his data being used by them in any way.

Accidentable's response letter confirms Louis's suspicions. Accidentable is Bedrock Insurance's wholly owned subsidiary, and they received information about Louis's accident from Bedrock shortly after Louis submitted his accident claim. Accidentable assures Louis that there has been no breach of the GDPR, as Louis's contract included, a provision in which he agreed to share his information with Bedrock's affiliates for business purposes.

Louis is disgusted by the way in which he has been treated by Bedrock, and writes to them insisting that all his information be erased from their computer system.

Based on the GDPR's position on the use of personal data for direct marketing purposes, which of the following is true about Louis's rights as a data subject?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Andra
4 months ago
After all those years, you'd think they'd treat him better!
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
5 months ago
Actually, Bedrock might have a point about the legal grounds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
5 months ago
Wait, how can they just keep using his data like that? Seems shady.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
5 months ago
Totally agree! Consent should be clear and revocable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
5 months ago
Louis definitely has the right to object to his data being used for marketing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
5 months ago
I thought there were exceptions to the right to object, especially if the data is needed for legal claims. This is a tricky one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
I recall that data subjects can withdraw consent at any time, so I believe option B might be the correct choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like once consent is given, it might be hard to retract it. I think I saw a similar question in our practice exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
5 months ago
I remember studying about data subjects' rights under GDPR, and I think Louis should be able to object to the marketing use of his data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
5 months ago
Ah, I think I've got this! The answer is B. We need to activate commitment management in the controlling area, the order type, and the individual internal order master data. That way, we ensure it's properly configured across all the relevant areas. Feels good to be sure about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll start by considering each option and how it might relate to identifying labor market segments and competitive positioning. The mission statement and organizational vision seem more high-level, so I'm leaning towards the business strategy or total rewards strategy as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
5 months ago
Option D sounds tempting, but increasing bugs in production doesn't seem like a benefit at all. Maybe it's about finding bugs before release instead?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel