Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPP-E Exam - Topic 6 Question 29 Discussion

As a result of the European Court of Justice's ruling in the case of Google v. Spain, search engines outside the EEA are also likely to be subject to the Regulation's right to be forgotten. This holds true if the activities of an EU subsidiary and its U.S. parent are what?
D) Inextricably linked in their businesses.
A) Supervised by the same Data Protection Officer.
B) Consistent with Privacy Shield requirements
C) Bound by a standard contractual clause.

IAPP CIPP-E Exam - Topic 6 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 6
[All CIPP-E Questions]

As a result of the European Court of Justice's ruling in the case of Google v. Spain, search engines outside the EEA are also likely to be subject to the Regulation's right to be forgotten. This holds true if the activities of an EU subsidiary and its U.S. parent are what?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Benton at May 08, 2022, 03:58 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP-E Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Margot
11 months ago
C is interesting too, but I lean towards D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
11 months ago
B could also be a contender, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds a bit too broad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
11 months ago
Totally agree, D makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
11 months ago
I think it's D, they have to be really connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that the ruling emphasized the connection between the EU subsidiary and the parent company, so "inextricably linked" might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
11 months ago
I feel like the Privacy Shield requirements were mentioned in a similar context, but I’m not confident that’s what this question is asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
I think we discussed how standard contractual clauses might apply in these cases, but I can't recall if that's the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
11 months ago
I remember something about the relationship between subsidiaries and parent companies, but I'm not sure if it was about being "inextricably linked" or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
12 months ago
Configuring a single contract provided and consumed in all EPGs - that seems like the simplest approach to try first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
12 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Is it the Plan phase or the Do phase where the controls should be described? I know the question is asking about the PDCA cycle, but I'm not totally clear on how that applies to the ISMS documentation. Guess I'll have to review my notes on this topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
12 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Let me re-read it a few times to make sure I'm interpreting it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
12 months ago
Okay, this seems straightforward. The question is asking if the iBMC of V5 Servers supports HTML5 KVM, so I just need to determine if that's true or false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
12 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about this in class. I think the answer is Dynamic Ratio, since that method takes into account the server's capacity and load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the other options like changing the zone or using Bigtable or Spanner as a buffer. Those seem like more complex solutions that might not be necessary if the simpler options work. I'll have to think through those more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel