Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPP-E Topic 3 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 3
[All CIPP-E Questions]

A homeowner has installed a motion-detecting surveillance system that films his front doc and entryway. The camera does not film any public areas only areas that are the property of the homeowner. The system has seen declared to the authorities per the homeowner's country law, and a placard indicating the area is being video monitored is visible when entering the property

Why can the homeowner NOT depend on the household exemption with regards to the processing of the video images recorded by the surveillance camera system?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Julianna
11 months ago
I believe the GDPR specifically excludes surveillance camera images from the household exemption, regardless of any placard displayed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
11 months ago
But what about the placard indicating the area is being monitored? Doesn't that count for something?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
11 months ago
I bet the homeowner thought they were being clever, but the GDPR has closed that loophole. Can't fool the regulators that easily!
upvoted 0 times
Leonor
10 months ago
D) The surveillance camera system can potentially film individuals who enter its filming perimeter
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
10 months ago
C) The GDPR specifically excludes surveillance camera images from the household exemption
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
11 months ago
A) The surveillance camera system can potentially capture biometric information of the homeowner's family, which would be considered a processing of special categories of personal data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ula
11 months ago
Hmm, the homeowner should have checked the local laws more closely before installing this system. Looks like they didn't do their homework!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
Option D is correct. The camera can film individuals who aren't part of the homeowner's family, so the household exemption doesn't apply.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
11 months ago
C) The GDPR specifically excludes surveillance camera images from the household exemption
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
11 months ago
A) The surveillance camera system can potentially capture biometric information of the homeowner's family, which would be considered a processing of special categories of personal data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herman
12 months ago
The household exemption doesn't apply here because the camera can capture biometric data of visitors, which is sensitive personal information. The GDPR has clear rules on this.
upvoted 0 times
Elden
11 months ago
That's correct. The GDPR rules are strict when it comes to capturing sensitive personal data like biometrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
11 months ago
C) The GDPR specifically excludes surveillance camera images from the household exemption
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
11 months ago
C) The GDPR specifically excludes surveillance camera images from the household exemption
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
11 months ago
A) The surveillance camera system can potentially capture biometric information of the homeowner's family, which would be considered a processing of special categories of personal data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
12 months ago
A) The surveillance camera system can potentially capture biometric information of the homeowner's family, which would be considered a processing of special categories of personal data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laticia
12 months ago
I agree with Janet. Processing special categories of personal data would not fall under the household exemption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
1 years ago
I think the homeowner cannot depend on the household exemption because the surveillance camera system can potentially capture biometric information.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel