Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPP-E Exam - Topic 2 Question 27 Discussion

What are the obligations of a processor that engages a sub-processor?
C) The processor must receive a written agreement that the sub-processor will be fully liable to the controller for the performance of its obligations in relation to the personal data concerned.
A) The processor must give the controller prior written notice and perform a preliminary audit of the sub- processor.
B) The processor must obtain the controller's specific written authorization and provide annual reports on the sub-processor's performance.
D) The processor must obtain the consent of the controller and ensure the sub-processor complies with data processing obligations that are equivalent to those that apply to the processor.

IAPP CIPP-E Exam - Topic 2 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 2
[All CIPP-E Questions]

What are the obligations of a processor that engages a sub-processor?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jovita at May 06, 2022, 10:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP-E Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Adelaide
11 months ago
Annual reports? That sounds like a lot of extra work!
upvoted 0 times
...
King
11 months ago
It's wild how much liability falls on the processor!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
11 months ago
I thought a simple notice was enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
11 months ago
Totally agree, compliance is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
11 months ago
The processor needs to get the controller's consent first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
11 months ago
I believe the processor must get the controller's consent, but I’m uncertain if it also needs to provide annual reports on the sub-processor's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on the controller's authorization. I feel like that might be important here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
11 months ago
I think the processor has to ensure the sub-processor complies with the same obligations, but I'm not sure if it needs the controller's consent first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
12 months ago
I remember something about needing a written agreement with the sub-processor, but I can't recall if it was specifically about liability or just compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question mentions the "Use Print as Master for Web Channel" option, so I'm wondering if the answer might be related to that in some way. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit torn between options A and D. Cloud Functions could be a more lightweight solution, but Stackdriver Monitoring might have better integration with the rest of the Google Cloud ecosystem. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
12 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a straightforward question about the types of employment tracked in the HR Profile table. I'll need to carefully read through the options and select the three that apply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
12 months ago
Okay, let's see... I think I remember seeing "lost MC" and "bad pkts" on that page, but I'm not sure about the third one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel