New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP-E Exam - Topic 1 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 1
[All CIPP-E Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Joe is the new privacy manager for Who-R-U, a Canadian business that provides DNA analysis. The company is headquartered in Montreal, and all of its employees are located there. The company offers its services to Canadians only: Its website is in English and French, it accepts only Canadian currency, and it blocks internet traffic from outside of Canada (although this solution doesn't prevent all non-Canadian traffic). It also declines to process orders that request the DNA report to be sent outside of Canada, and returns orders that show a non-Canadian return address.

Bob, the President of Who-R-U, thinks there is a lot of interest for the product in the EU, and the company is exploring a number of plans to expand its customer base.

The first plan, collegially called We-Track-U, will use an app to collect information about its current Canadian customer base. The expansion will allow its Canadian customers to use the app while traveling abroad. He suggests that the company use this app to gather location information. If the plan shows promise, Bob proposes to use push notifications and text messages to encourage existing customers to pre-register for an EU version of the service. Bob calls this work plan, We-Text-U. Once the company has gathered enough pre- registrations, it will develop EU-specific content and services.

Another plan is called Customer for Life. The idea is to offer additional services through the company's app, like storage and sharing of DNA information with other applications and medical providers. The company's contract says that it can keep customer DNA indefinitely, and use it to offer new services and market them to customers. It also says that customers agree not to withdraw direct marketing consent. Paul, the marketing director, suggests that the company should fully exploit these provisions, and that it can work around customers' attempts to withdraw consent because the contract invalidates them.

The final plan is to develop a brand presence in the EU. The company has already begun this process. It is in the process of purchasing the naming rights for a building in Germany, which would come with a few offices that Who-R-U executives can use while traveling internationally. The office doesn't include any technology or infrastructure; rather, it's simply a room with a desk and some chairs.

On a recent trip concerning the naming-rights deal, Bob's laptop is stolen. The laptop held unencrypted DNA reports on 5,000 Who-R-U customers, all of whom are residents of Canad

a. The reports include customer name, birthdate, ethnicity, racial background, names of relatives, gender, and occasionally health information.

The Customer for Life plan may conflict with which GDPR provision?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Soledad
4 months ago
Article 6 could also be a problem if they don't have lawful processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
4 months ago
I think they might run into trouble with GDPR if they expand to the EU.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
5 months ago
Wait, can they really keep DNA info indefinitely? That sounds sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
5 months ago
Totally agree, they can't just ignore consent like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
5 months ago
Article 7 is definitely the issue here. Consent withdrawal should be easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
5 months ago
I feel like Article 7 is the strongest candidate here. The idea of not allowing customers to withdraw consent seems to go against what GDPR is trying to protect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
5 months ago
I practiced a question about data rights under GDPR, and I think Article 20 about data portability could be a concern, but it seems less directly related than the consent issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think Article 6 might be relevant too since it talks about lawful processing. The way they plan to keep DNA indefinitely feels questionable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
5 months ago
I remember discussing how GDPR emphasizes the importance of consent, especially in Article 7. It seems like the Customer for Life plan could definitely conflict with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
5 months ago
I've got it! The user recognizing the email as suspicious means it's in the reconnaissance stage, where the attacker is gathering information about the target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
5 months ago
I think the highlights panel is the important part here. I'll focus on that when deciding my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. I'll read through the options and see which one best matches the description of Vulnerability Response components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
5 months ago
Hmm, the core layer is supposed to handle high-speed traffic, so I'm leaning towards QoS prioritization in option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
6 months ago
Shifts seem like the most logical connection to breaks, so I'm going to select C. But I'm not 100% sure, so I'll double-check my work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel