New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP-E Exam - Topic 1 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 1
[All CIPP-E Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Joe is the new privacy manager for Who-R-U, a Canadian business that provides DNA analysis. The company is headquartered in Montreal, and all of its employees are located there. The company offers its services to Canadians only: Its website is in English and French, it accepts only Canadian currency, and it blocks internet traffic from outside of Canada (although this solution doesn't prevent all non-Canadian traffic). It also declines to process orders that request the DNA report to be sent outside of Canada, and returns orders that show a non-Canadian return address.

Bob, the President of Who-R-U, thinks there is a lot of interest for the product in the EU, and the company is exploring a number of plans to expand its customer base.

The first plan, collegially called We-Track-U, will use an app to collect information about its current Canadian customer base. The expansion will allow its Canadian customers to use the app while traveling abroad. He

suggests that the company use this app to gather location information. If the plan shows promise, Bob proposes to use push notifications and text messages to encourage existing customers to pre-register for an EU version of the service. Bob calls this work plan, We-Text-U. Once the company has gathered enough pre- registrations, it will develop EU-specific content and services.

Another plan is called Customer for Life. The idea is to offer additional services through the company's app, like storage and sharing of DNA information with other applications and medical providers. The company's contract says that it can keep customer DNA indefinitely, and use it to offer new services and market them to customers. It also says that customers agree not to withdraw direct marketing consent. Paul, the marketing director, suggests that the company should fully exploit these provisions, and that it can work around customers' attempts to withdraw consent because the contract invalidates them.

The final plan is to develop a brand presence in the EU. The company has already begun this process. It is in the process of purchasing the naming rights for a building in Germany, which would come with a few offices that Who-R-U executives can use while traveling internationally. The office doesn't include any technology or infrastructure; rather, it's simply a room with a desk and some chairs.

On a recent trip concerning the naming-rights deal, Bob's laptop is stolen. The laptop held unencrypted DNA reports on 5,000 Who-R-U customers, all of whom are residents of Canad

a. The reports include customer name, birthdate, ethnicity, racial background, names of relatives, gender, and occasionally health information.

If Who-R-U adopts the We-Track-U pilot plan, why is it likely to be subject to the territorial scope of the GDPR?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Judy
4 months ago
Totally agree with B! They’re targeting EU data subjects for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
4 months ago
Wow, I didn’t know they could keep DNA info indefinitely!
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
5 months ago
Wait, can they really just ignore consent like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
5 months ago
I think it’s B. They’re offering services to EU customers, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
5 months ago
Sounds like they’re definitely monitoring behavior with that app!
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B as well, but I wonder if they could argue that they’re not targeting EU customers directly. It’s a tricky situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
5 months ago
I feel like option A could also apply since they might be establishing a presence in the EU with the app. But I need to double-check that part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
5 months ago
I remember a practice question about monitoring behavior, so option D could be relevant too. If they're tracking location data, that seems like monitoring to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
5 months ago
I think the We-Track-U plan might fall under option B because they would be offering services to EU customers, right? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at now. One of these deposition practices is less common than the others. I think I know which one, but I'll double-check my reasoning before selecting the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think I can narrow it down if I carefully analyze the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The Top-Down Approach seems like it would involve starting with high-level security policies and then implementing them throughout the organization. The Bottom-Up Approach might focus more on addressing specific security risks and vulnerabilities first. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with Probe or LTE network air interface testing. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
6 months ago
I recall we practiced similar questions, and I remember SYN packets could mean a denial-of-service attack, but does that apply to just one source or multiple?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel