According to the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act, which of the following data breach reporting notifications to the commissioner is NOT automatically triggered when real risk of significant harm (RROSH) has been determined?
Hmm, I'm not sure, but I think C. Providing an estimate of the number of individuals affected by the breach is the one that is not automatically triggered.
I’m a bit confused here. I thought all of these were important, but maybe the steps to notify individuals aren’t always required? I need to double-check that.
I practiced a similar question, and I think the one about reducing harm is usually expected. I'm leaning towards option A being the one that isn't automatically triggered.
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the description of the personal information involved is definitely a must. Could it be the estimate of individuals affected that's not automatic?
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. I'll focus on identifying the notification that is not automatically required when a real risk of significant harm has been determined.
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the key details in the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act to determine which notification is not automatically triggered.
Roosevelt
13 days agoMaile
18 days agoFlo
24 days agoMiss
29 days agoKirk
1 month agoSherell
1 month agoAdelina
1 month agoReuben
2 months agoRashad
2 months agoArmanda
2 months agoPercy
3 months agoMaia
3 months agoCecily
3 months agoSherell
3 months agoLouvenia
3 months agoGennie
3 months agoFloyd
4 months agoLawanda
4 months agoChristene
4 months agoLudivina
4 months agoCharlette
4 months agoCristal
5 months agoHerminia
5 months agoGeorgene
5 months agoJudy
6 months agoKeith
3 days agoDelsie
8 days agoAnnita
5 months agoDorcas
5 months ago