According to the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act, which of the following data breach reporting notifications to the commissioner is NOT automatically triggered when real risk of significant harm (RROSH) has been determined?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CIPP/C Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
RO
Roosevelt
6 months ago
I feel unsure about this one.
MA
Maile
7 months ago
A and B are definitely required.
FL
Flo
7 months ago
D seems less critical to report.
MI
Miss
7 months ago
I agree with Kirk. Just a guess though.
KI
Kirk
7 months ago
I think it's C. No estimate needed.
SH
Sherell
7 months ago
I’m surprised C isn’t automatic, seems important!
AD
Adelina
7 months ago
A and B are definitely required, but C is tricky.
RE
Reuben
8 months ago
Wait, really? I thought all those were mandatory!
RA
Rashad
8 months ago
Totally agree, C is the odd one out here.
AR
Armanda
8 months ago
Wait, is the answer "All of the above"? I mean, who doesn't love a good trick question!
PE
Percy
9 months ago
I'm going with D. Providing a description of the personal information involved in the breach. That one seems like the odd one out.
MA
Maia
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure, but I think C. Providing an estimate of the number of individuals affected by the breach is the one that is not automatically triggered.
CE
Cecily
9 months ago
D. Providing a description of the personal information involved in the breach seems like the one that is not automatically triggered.
SH
Sherell
9 months ago
I think the answer is B. Providing a description of the steps the organization has taken to reduce or mitigate that harm.
LO
Louvenia
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused here. I thought all of these were important, but maybe the steps to notify individuals aren’t always required? I need to double-check that.
GE
Gennie
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the one about reducing harm is usually expected. I'm leaning towards option A being the one that isn't automatically triggered.
FL
Floyd
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the description of the personal information involved is definitely a must. Could it be the estimate of individuals affected that's not automatic?
LA
Lawanda
10 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this question. The key is understanding the specific breach reporting obligations under the Alberta Act.
CH
Christene
10 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll methodically go through the options and eliminate the ones that are automatically required.
LU
Ludivina
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. I'll focus on identifying the notification that is not automatically required when a real risk of significant harm has been determined.
CH
Charlette
10 months ago
I think I remember that not all notifications are required when RROSH is determined. Maybe it's the one about the steps taken to notify individuals?
CR
Cristal
11 months ago
C is the one that doesn't trigger automatically.
HE
Herminia
11 months ago
This question is tricky!
GE
Georgene
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to make sure I understand the specific requirements around breach reporting under this Act.
JU
Judy
12 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the key details in the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act to determine which notification is not automatically triggered.
KE
Kendra
6 months ago
Good points! Let’s dig into the act and clarify this.
KE
Keith
6 months ago
I’m not so sure about that. D seems less likely to be triggered.
DE
Delsie
6 months ago
I agree! It's all about understanding the specifics.
AN
Annita
11 months ago
This is definitely tricky! I think I need to look at the act closely.
DO
Dorcas
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C. What do you think?