New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPM Exam - Topic 9 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPM exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 9
[All CIPM Questions]

Under which circumstances would people who work in human resources be considered a secondary audience for privacy metrics?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lourdes
4 months ago
Not sure if D is a strong enough reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
5 months ago
They still need some training on privacy, though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
5 months ago
Wait, are HR really that disconnected from privacy issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
5 months ago
Totally agree with C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
5 months ago
They don't have privacy policy as their main task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
5 months ago
D seems plausible too, but I wonder if their lack of public interaction really makes them secondary in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
5 months ago
Could it be A? I feel like if they don’t get training on privacy issues, they wouldn’t be as involved in those metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that mentioned how secondary audiences might not have direct responsibilities related to privacy metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
5 months ago
I think the answer might be C since HR's main focus isn't usually on privacy policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
5 months ago
Wait, is this asking about a PE file or a Flash file? I'm a little confused on the specifics of the question. I'll have to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Is "lean" also a valid option here? I know that's about efficiency and streamlining, but does that also relate to how the organization collaborates? I'll have to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If I had to guess, I'd say it's probably option B - using the same method as 16-bit but with a different attribute for the 32-bit AS numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel