New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPM Exam - Topic 7 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPM exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 7
[All CIPM Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:

John is the new privacy officer at the prestigious international law firm -- A&M LLP. A&M LLP is very proud of its reputation in the practice areas of Trusts & Estates and Merger & Acquisition in both U.S. and Europe.

During lunch with a colleague from the Information Technology department, John heard that the Head of IT, Derrick, is about to outsource the firm's email continuity service to their existing email security vendor -- MessageSafe. Being successful as an email hygiene vendor, MessageSafe is expanding its business by leasing cloud infrastructure from Cloud Inc. to host email continuity service for A&M LLP.

John is very concerned about this initiative. He recalled that MessageSafe was in the news six months ago due to a security breach. Immediately, John did a quick research of MessageSafe's previous breach and learned that the breach was caused by an unintentional mistake by an IT administrator. He scheduled a meeting with Derrick to address his concerns.

At the meeting, Derrick emphasized that email is the primary method for the firm's lawyers to communicate with clients, thus it is critical to have the email continuity service to avoid any possible email downtime. Derrick has been using the anti-spam service provided by MessageSafe for five years and is very happy with the quality of service provided by MessageSafe. In addition to the significant discount offered by MessageSafe, Derrick emphasized that he can also speed up the onboarding process since the firm already has a service contract in place with MessageSafe. The existing on-premises email continuity solution is about to reach its end of life very soon and he doesn't have the time or resource to look for another solution. Furthermore, the off- premises email continuity service will only be turned on when the email service at A&M LLP's primary and secondary data centers are both down, and the email messages stored at MessageSafe site for continuity service will be automatically deleted after 30 days.

Which of the following is a TRUE statement about the relationship among the organizations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Timmy
3 months ago
Amending the service contract sounds like a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
3 months ago
Wait, can we really trust MessageSafe after that incident?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
4 months ago
I think Cloud Inc. should have a data processor agreement in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
4 months ago
Totally agree, we need to be cautious about this outsourcing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
4 months ago
MessageSafe had a breach last year, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
4 months ago
I vaguely remember that service contracts need to be updated when sub-processors are involved. So, amending A&M LLP's contract to include Cloud Inc. sounds right, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
4 months ago
I feel like there was something about data processor agreements in our readings. It seems like Cloud Inc. should definitely have one with A&M LLP, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
5 months ago
I think I saw a similar question about liability in a practice exam. If MessageSafe is using Cloud Inc. for hosting, they might be liable for any breaches that happen there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of data breach notifications in class, but I'm not sure if Cloud Inc. is directly obligated to notify A&M LLP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
5 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. If the 'Match Audience Rules to See Experiences' setting is enabled, that could be the reason the analyst doesn't see the targeted content for Experience B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about identifying the appropriate logs to review for a malware incident. I think the DNS server logs would be the best place to start, as they could provide information on the external site the malware is attempting to beacon to.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the information in the notes. The loan is repayable in 20X9, but the question is asking about the year ended 31 December 20X4. How do I determine the correct Interest figure to use? I'll need to re-read the notes carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
10 months ago
I'm not sure if Derrick is being overly optimistic or just plain reckless. Either way, I wouldn't want to be the one explaining a data breach to our clients. Maybe we should call in an expert to take a look at this before we sign on the dotted line.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
8 months ago
Let's make sure we have all our bases covered before moving forward with this outsourcing agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
8 months ago
It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to protecting sensitive client information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
8 months ago
I think we should definitely consult with a data security expert before making any decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
9 months ago
I agree, we need to prioritize data security above all else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
9 months ago
Let's make sure we have all our bases covered before moving forward with this outsourcing agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
9 months ago
It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to protecting sensitive client information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
10 months ago
I think we should definitely consult with a data security expert before making any decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
10 months ago
I agree, we need to prioritize data security above all else.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenore
10 months ago
Wow, Derrick really seems to be prioritizing speed and cost over security. I guess when you're the Head of IT, you don't have to worry about those pesky privacy laws, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
10 months ago
Haha, I bet Derrick is just trying to save a few bucks by going with the discount option. But hey, who needs security when you've got cheap, right? I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong.
upvoted 0 times
Paris
9 months ago
I think John is right to be concerned about the potential risks involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
10 months ago
I agree, it seems risky to prioritize cost over security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruthann
10 months ago
I see Derrick's point about the importance of email continuity, but the previous breach is a red flag. We need to ensure our client data is protected, even if it means taking the time to find a more reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
Wait, so MessageSafe had a security breach before? I'm not sure I'd be comfortable trusting them with our firm's email continuity service. Maybe we should consider a more secure option, even if it's a bit more expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
11 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think the answer might be D) A&M LLP's service contract must be amended to list Cloud Inc. as a sub-processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
11 months ago
I agree with you, Cory. A data processor agreement is necessary to ensure data protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) Cloud Inc. should enter into a data processor agreement with A&M LLP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel