U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IAPP CIPM Exam - Topic 2 Question 75 Discussion

The first step an organization should take when considering the use of a third-party's AI-based resume ranking tool is to?
D) Secure appropriate contractual concessions to ensure that the developer is primarily responsible for any violation of applicable privacy law.
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
C) Distribute a notice to the candidates whose resumes the tool will assess to ensure they understand and consent to the use of the tool.

IAPP CIPM Exam - Topic 2 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPM exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 2
[All CIPM Questions]

The first step an organization should take when considering the use of a third-party's AI-based resume ranking tool is to?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the obligations of a processor that engages a sub-processor are to obtain the consent of the controller and ensure the sub-processor complies with data processing obligations that are equivalent to those that apply to the processor. The GDPR defines a processor as a natural or legal person, public authority, agency, or other body that processes personal data on behalf of the controller. A sub-processor is a third party that is engaged by the processor to carry out specific processing activities on behalf of the controller. The GDPR requires that the processor does not engage another processor without prior specific or general written authorization of the controller. In the case of general written authorization, the processor must inform the controller of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of other processors, thereby giving the controller the opportunity to object to such changes. The processor must also ensure that the same data protection obligations as set out in the contract or other legal act between the controller and the processor are imposed on that other processor by way of a contract or other legal act under Union or Member State law, .Reference:[GDPR Article 28], [CIPM - International Association of Privacy Professionals]


by Adolph at Oct 22, 2024, 07:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vivan
7 months ago
C is a good idea, but it might scare off applicants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
7 months ago
D seems risky. What if the developer goes bankrupt?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
7 months ago
Wait, do candidates really need to consent?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
7 months ago
I think B is more important. Privacy matters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
8 months ago
A is definitely the first step!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
8 months ago
I studied about contractual obligations and privacy laws, and I think securing those concessions is vital, but I’m not convinced it’s the first thing to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
8 months ago
I feel like notifying candidates is crucial, but I can't recall if that should be the very first step. It seems like there are so many factors to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question about assessing the tool's impact on privacy. That seems really important, but I wonder if it should come first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
8 months ago
I think the first step should be about getting stakeholder buy-in, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the most critical initial action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
8 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. There are a lot of important considerations to keep in mind when adopting a new AI tool. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully to make sure I don't miss anything critical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to focus on the first step, which is likely about securing the necessary approvals and assessing the tool's impact before moving forward. I think B is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. There are a few important factors to weigh here - privacy, legal compliance, stakeholder buy-in. I'll need to really analyze each answer choice to determine the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the initial steps an organization should take when considering a third-party AI resume ranking tool. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the key considerations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
1 year ago
Option A - because it's always better to get approval from the higher-ups, even if they're still using their typewriters.
upvoted 0 times
Otis
11 months ago
D) Secure appropriate contractual concessions to ensure that the developer is primarily responsible for any violation of applicable privacy law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
12 months ago
C) Distribute a notice to the candidates whose resumes the tool will assess to ensure they understand and consent to the use of the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
12 months ago
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
1 year ago
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geraldo
1 year ago
I'm torn between B and C. Covering both privacy and consent is probably the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
D seems like the safest option. Shifting the responsibility to the developer is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Gwen
12 months ago
D) Secure appropriate contractual concessions to ensure that the developer is primarily responsible for any violation of applicable privacy law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
1 year ago
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 year ago
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caprice
1 year ago
Definitely C. Informing the candidates and getting their consent is the ethical and legal thing to do.
upvoted 0 times
Annmarie
1 year ago
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
1 year ago
C) Distribute a notice to the candidates whose resumes the tool will assess to ensure they understand and consent to the use of the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalyn
1 year ago
I'm going with A. Securing stakeholder buy-in is essential to ensure the tool aligns with the organization's needs.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
1 year ago
C) Distribute a notice to the candidates whose resumes the tool will assess to ensure they understand and consent to the use of the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 year ago
I agree, getting stakeholder buy-in is crucial for successful implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
1 year ago
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
1 year ago
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
1 year ago
But we also need to consider privacy and regulation, so conducting an assessment is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. Assessing the tool's impact on privacy and AI regulations is crucial before implementation.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
1 year ago
Yes, getting stakeholder buy-in and approval is also crucial to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
1 year ago
And we need to secure contractual concessions to hold the developer responsible for any privacy law violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to consider privacy and regulations before using the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
1 year ago
Yes, that's important too. We should also distribute a notice to candidates to ensure they understand and consent to the tool's use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 year ago
But don't we also need to get stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure it meets our requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
1 year ago
I agree, assessing the tool's impact on privacy and AI regulations is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oneida
1 year ago
I agree with Jess, it's important to make sure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
1 year ago
I think the first step should be to secure stakeholder buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel