Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H35-920 Exam - Topic 1 Question 125 Discussion

Which of the following methods can be used to cascading delete the records of two models? (Multiple Choice)
A) If the property of model A is Dependence and depends on model B, data in model A will be deleted when data of model B is deleted. and B) You can configure a rule whose event is model A's delete, and action is another model's delete.
C) If the property of model A is Reference and depends on model B, data in model A will be deleted when data of model B is deleted.
D) If the property of model A is Reference(Clear field) and depends on model B, data in model A will be deleted when data of model B is deleted.

Huawei H35-920 Exam - Topic 1 Question 125 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-920 exam
Question #: 125
Topic #: 1
[All H35-920 Questions]

Which of the following methods can be used to cascading delete the records of two models? (Multiple Choice)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by King at May 07, 2026, 01:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H35-920 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ailene
2 days ago
I feel confident about A, C, and D. They all fit the criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
7 days ago
D sounds like it could work, but I’m not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
12 days ago
True, C is valid. D might be confusing though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
17 days ago
C is definitely right too. References should cascade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
23 days ago
I agree with A, but B seems a bit tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
28 days ago
I think A and B are correct. They make sense for cascading deletes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
1 month ago
Yeah, I’d stick with A and B for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
1 month ago
I feel like A and B are the safest choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
1 month ago
True, but if it’s a clear reference, D could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
2 months ago
C is tricky. Reference doesn’t always mean delete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
2 months ago
I agree, but B seems valid too. Configuring a rule is a solid approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
2 months ago
I think option A is correct. Dependence makes sense for cascading deletes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
2 months ago
Totally agree with A and B, they make sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
2 months ago
Wait, D deletes data too? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
C seems off to me, isn't it just for references?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
3 months ago
I think B is also a valid method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
3 months ago
A is correct, that's how dependence works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
3 months ago
I thought that if model A has a "Reference" to model B, it wouldn't automatically delete unless specified, so I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option C and D. Aren't both "Reference" and "Reference(Clear field)" supposed to behave differently?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I feel like option B might be the correct approach for setting up cascading deletes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if "Dependence" is the right term for cascading deletes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel