Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H35-560 Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

In mobile communication systems, there are usually two ways to define/obtain KPL: eNodeB performance statistics and drive test tools for drive test.
A) True
B) False

Huawei H35-560 Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-560 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All H35-560 Questions]

In mobile communication systems, there are usually two ways to define/obtain KPL: eNodeB performance statistics and drive test tools for drive test.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Bernadine at May 05, 2025, 05:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H35-560 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shaniqua
7 months ago
False! I think there are other metrics involved too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
7 months ago
Yep, eNodeB and drive tests are the main ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
7 months ago
I totally agree, both methods are essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
7 months ago
That's true, eNodeB stats and drive tests are key for KPL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought there were more ways to define KPL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
8 months ago
I thought KPL was only derived from eNodeB performance stats, but now I'm questioning if drive tests play a role too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
8 months ago
I feel like we discussed this in class, and it seems true that both methods are valid for KPL, but I could be mistaken.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
8 months ago
I remember a practice question about KPL, and it mentioned eNodeB performance, but I can't recall if drive tests were included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
8 months ago
I think KPL can be defined using both eNodeB stats and drive tests, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
9 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of mobile communication systems. I remember the instructor talking about eNodeB performance stats and drive tests as the main ways to measure KPLs, so I'm confident the answer is True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
9 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Are there really only two ways to define/obtain KPLs? I feel like there might be other methods as well, but I could be wrong. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
9 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know eNodeB performance statistics and drive test tools are both ways to measure KPLs, so I'm guessing the answer is True. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we covered KPLs in class, but I can't quite remember the details on how they are defined or obtained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about mobile communication systems. I'm pretty confident I can handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
1 year ago
True, no doubt about it. Unless you're driving a car with square wheels, in which case the drive test might not be too reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
1 year ago
False
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
1 year ago
I agree, eNodeB performance statistics are usually more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
1 year ago
True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniela
1 year ago
I disagree, I think the answer is B) False because there may be other ways to define/obtain KPL in mobile communication systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it makes sense that the answer is A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
1 year ago
False? Seriously? Clearly the question is asking about the two standard ways to get KPL data. This one's a no-brainer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
1 year ago
I agree with Doug, because eNodeB performance statistics and drive test tools are commonly used to obtain KPL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
1 year ago
Definitely true! I've seen both methods used in mobile networks. The eNodeB stats give you the big picture, but drive tests fill in the gaps.
upvoted 0 times
Cecily
1 year ago
Using both methods together provides a comprehensive view of network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
1 year ago
Drive tests are essential for identifying specific coverage and quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
1 year ago
I agree, eNodeB stats are great for overall performance monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Doug
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel