Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H35-560 Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-560 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All H35-560 Questions]

In mobile communication systems, there are usually two ways to define/obtain KPL: eNodeB performance statistics and drive test tools for drive test.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Bernadine at May 05, 2025, 05:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H35-560 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shaniqua
4 months ago
False! I think there are other metrics involved too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
4 months ago
Yep, eNodeB and drive tests are the main ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
4 months ago
I totally agree, both methods are essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
4 months ago
That's true, eNodeB stats and drive tests are key for KPL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought there were more ways to define KPL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
5 months ago
I thought KPL was only derived from eNodeB performance stats, but now I'm questioning if drive tests play a role too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
5 months ago
I feel like we discussed this in class, and it seems true that both methods are valid for KPL, but I could be mistaken.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
5 months ago
I remember a practice question about KPL, and it mentioned eNodeB performance, but I can't recall if drive tests were included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
5 months ago
I think KPL can be defined using both eNodeB stats and drive tests, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
6 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of mobile communication systems. I remember the instructor talking about eNodeB performance stats and drive tests as the main ways to measure KPLs, so I'm confident the answer is True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
6 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Are there really only two ways to define/obtain KPLs? I feel like there might be other methods as well, but I could be wrong. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know eNodeB performance statistics and drive test tools are both ways to measure KPLs, so I'm guessing the answer is True. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we covered KPLs in class, but I can't quite remember the details on how they are defined or obtained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about mobile communication systems. I'm pretty confident I can handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
11 months ago
True, no doubt about it. Unless you're driving a car with square wheels, in which case the drive test might not be too reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
9 months ago
False
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
10 months ago
I agree, eNodeB performance statistics are usually more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
10 months ago
True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniela
11 months ago
I disagree, I think the answer is B) False because there may be other ways to define/obtain KPL in mobile communication systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it makes sense that the answer is A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
11 months ago
False? Seriously? Clearly the question is asking about the two standard ways to get KPL data. This one's a no-brainer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
11 months ago
I agree with Doug, because eNodeB performance statistics and drive test tools are commonly used to obtain KPL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
11 months ago
Definitely true! I've seen both methods used in mobile networks. The eNodeB stats give you the big picture, but drive tests fill in the gaps.
upvoted 0 times
Cecily
10 months ago
Using both methods together provides a comprehensive view of network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
10 months ago
Drive tests are essential for identifying specific coverage and quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
10 months ago
I agree, eNodeB stats are great for overall performance monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Doug
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel