Huawei H35-481_V2.0 Exam - Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-481_V2.0 exam

Question #: 17
Topic #: 1

[All H35-481_V2.0 Questions]

Which of the following 5G network technologies can reduce IoV latency?

AMEC

BNFV

CMassive MIMO

DSDN

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

MEC (Mobile Edge Computing) is a network technology that enables the deployment of computing and storage resources at the edge of the network, closer to the end-users. This can significantly reduce the latency for various applications, such as IoT, AR/VR and IoV. By moving the computing and storage resources closer to the end-users, the data can be processed and stored closer to the source, reducing the time and distance that the data needs to travel. This can reduce the overall latency and improve the user experience.

According to the official GSMA white paper on 5G and IoV, MEC can reduce latency by bringing computing resources closer to the edges of the network. This can be particularly beneficial for IoV applications, which require low latency and high reliability. Additionally, NFV (Network Function Virtualization), Massive MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) and SDN (Software Defined Networking) can also be used to improve performance and reduce latency in 5G networks. Reference: https://www.gsma.com/iot/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/GSMA_5G_IoV_White_Paper_Final.pdf

by Frederica at Oct 18, 2023, 09:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H35-481_V2.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aaron

10 months ago

Totally agree, MEC is a game changer for IoV!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

10 months ago

NFV is more about flexibility, not latency reduction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xochitl

10 months ago

Massive MIMO sounds interesting, but does it really cut latency?

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

11 months ago

I think SDN can help too, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

11 months ago

MEC is the way to go for low latency!

upvoted 0 times

...

Myrtie

11 months ago

SDN sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it directly impacts latency for IoV. I feel like MEC is the safer bet here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dulce

11 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I think Massive MIMO might help with capacity but not specifically with latency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coleen

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember NFV being more about network management than reducing latency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oretha

12 months ago

I think MEC is the right answer since it brings computation closer to the edge, which should help with latency in IoV.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marg

12 months ago

NFV is interesting, but I'm not sure how it specifically relates to reducing IoV latency. I'll need to research that one a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

12 months ago

SDN might be a good choice too, since it allows for more dynamic network control and optimization. I'll review the key features of each technology.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

12 months ago

Massive MIMO could also help reduce IoV latency by improving spectral efficiency and capacity. I'll make sure to consider all the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

12 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think through the different 5G technologies and how they impact latency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florencia

12 months ago

I think the answer is MEC, since it allows processing to be done closer to the IoV devices, reducing latency.

upvoted 0 times

...

In

12 months ago

This question seems straightforward. I'll read through the options carefully and eliminate the ones that are clearly types of privacy program metrics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominic

12 months ago

This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is B - Standards continue to be developed by monitoring external best practice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

12 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different aspects of quality management, but I'm not sure which one best captures the main purpose of the ISO/IEC 20000 standard.

upvoted 0 times

...