Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H35-480_V3.0 Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

If multiple IP addresses are planned for a gNodeB and the next-hop IP addresses are different, which of the following route configurations is more suitable?
D) Direct route configuration
A) Source address route configuration
B) Dynamic route configuration
C) Destination address route configuration

Huawei H35-480_V3.0 Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-480_V3.0 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All H35-480_V3.0 Questions]

If multiple IP addresses are planned for a gNodeB and the next-hop IP addresses are different, which of the following route configurations is more suitable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the official Huawei documentation, the first message sent by a gNodeB to an AMF is NGAP_INIT_UE_MSG. This message is used to initiate a connection between the gNodeB and AMF.


by Melodie at May 12, 2024, 12:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H35-480_V3.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rebeca
10 months ago
I didn't realize there were so many options for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
10 months ago
C seems off, destination routing isn't flexible enough here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
10 months ago
Wait, isn't A more suitable for source-based routing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
11 months ago
Definitely agree with B, it handles multiple next-hop IPs well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
I think B is the best choice for dynamic routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
11 months ago
I feel like direct route configuration is too simplistic for this scenario, especially with multiple IPs involved. It doesn't seem suitable at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the destination address route configuration. It seems like it could work, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
11 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think dynamic route configuration was mentioned as a good option for varying next-hop addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
12 months ago
I think the source address route configuration might be the right choice since it can handle multiple IPs effectively, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
12 months ago
Source address route configuration? That doesn't sound right for this situation. I'm going to eliminate that option and focus on the other choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since the next-hop IP addresses are different, a dynamic route configuration would be the most suitable approach to handle the multiple IP addresses for the gNodeB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and make sure I understand the key details about the gNodeB and next-hop IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
12 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think through the different routing configurations and how they would apply in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
12 months ago
I'm torn between resource allocation and demand management. They both sound relevant, but which one specifically defines constraints?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
12 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Safety stock is used to protect against demand fluctuations, so the answer has to be either A or B. I'll think through the timing of the order point to determine the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
12 months ago
I remember PTAs are more complex than regular correspondent accounts. I'll look for something about fund management control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
1 year ago
I'm going with C) Destination address route configuration. It's the only one that mentions the destination, and that's what really matters when you've got multiple IPs and next-hops, right?
upvoted 0 times
Yasuko
1 year ago
Yeah, C) Destination address route configuration seems like the most logical choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 year ago
I think so too, it's important to consider the destination when dealing with multiple IP addresses and next-hops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
I agree, C) Destination address route configuration makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
A) Source address route configuration is the way to go, hands down. It's the only option that specifically mentions the source IP address, and that's got to be the key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 year ago
D) Direct route configuration has got to be the answer. It's the most straightforward approach, and I like to keep things simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Marta
1 year ago
Direct route configuration is my choice too. It just makes everything easier to handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 year ago
Dynamic route configuration might be more flexible, but direct route configuration is easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
1 year ago
I agree, direct route configuration is the most straightforward option for multiple IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 year ago
Direct route configuration is definitely the way to go. It's simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joseph
1 year ago
B) Dynamic route configuration sounds like the way to go. That way, the routing table can automatically adjust as needed. Gotta love that adaptability!
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
1 year ago
Dynamic route configuration allows for flexibility and automatic adjustments in the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
1 year ago
I agree, dynamic route configuration is definitely the way to go for multiple IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharika
1 year ago
That makes sense, but I still think C) Destination address route configuration is more suitable for multiple IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Dynamic route configuration because it can adapt to changes in next-hop IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Destination address route configuration. That seems like the most logical choice when dealing with multiple IP addresses and different next-hop addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Destination address route configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel