Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei Exam H35-211_V2.5 Topic 8 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-211_V2.5 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 8
[All H35-211_V2.5 Questions]

(Radio) When the 0LT global or VLAN service template enables the PITP switch, the service port allows the upstream packet to be carried, the Vendor tag switch, and the user to carry the vendor upstream packet In the case of tarf information, the following statement regarding olts to PITP message processing strategies is correct

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Martina at Sep 16, 2024, 04:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H35-211_V2.5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Filiberto
10 months ago
You know, if the OLT drops those upstream PITP packets, it's gonna be like a giant game of hot potato, but with data. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Haley
9 months ago
User 3: Definitely, having the Vendor tag carried in the upstream PITP message is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it would be chaotic if the OLT just dropped the packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
9 months ago
User 1: I agree, option C seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jean
11 months ago
Wait, the OLT adds a local vendor tag? That's wild! I'm going with C just to avoid that vendor tag chaos.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) OLT forwards the USER-side PITP message directly without any processing could also be a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
11 months ago
C is the way to go, folks. Don't want the OLT to be slacking on its vendor tag duties, now do we? Keeps the network running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to go with C as well. Can't have the OLT just dropping those packets! Gotta keep that vendor tag in check.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
10 months ago
Definitely, C is the safest choice to ensure the vendor tag is carried in the upstream PITP message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
10 months ago
Yeah, we can't have the OLT dropping those packets, C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
10 months ago
I agree, C seems like the best option to keep the vendor tag in check.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linn
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) OLT is left with the Vendor tag carried in the upstream PITP message, plus the local Vendor tag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
11 months ago
I agree with Celeste. C is the correct answer. The OLT has to deal with the vendor tag, but it shouldn't be forwarding the user-side PITP message without any processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) OLT adds a local Vendor tag to the upstream PITP packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
11 months ago
Option C seems the most logical to me. The OLT shouldn't be dropping the upstream PITP packets, and it needs to handle the vendor tag appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
10 months ago
OLT forwarding the USER-side PITP message directly doesn't seem right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
10 months ago
OLT adding a local Vendor tag makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
10 months ago
I agree, the OLT should handle the vendor tag in the upstream PITP message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
11 months ago
I think option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel