Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H35-211_V2.5 Exam - Topic 8 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-211_V2.5 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 8
[All H35-211_V2.5 Questions]

(Radio) When the 0LT global or VLAN service template enables the PITP switch, the service port allows the upstream packet to be carried, the Vendor tag switch, and the user to carry the vendor upstream packet In the case of tarf information, the following statement regarding olts to PITP message processing strategies is correct

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Martina at Sep 16, 2024, 04:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H35-211_V2.5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kara
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? Sounds a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
5 months ago
D? Really? That doesn't make sense at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
5 months ago
C sounds right, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
5 months ago
Definitely not B, that seems too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
5 months ago
I think OLT adds a local Vendor tap to the upstream PITP packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D, but I vaguely remember something about the OLT needing to process the PITP packets instead of just dropping them.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
6 months ago
I feel like option C might be correct since it mentions the Vendor tag, but I can't recall the specifics of how the OLT handles those packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
6 months ago
I remember a practice question where the OLT forwarded messages without processing, so option B sounds familiar, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
6 months ago
I think the OLT adds a local Vendor tag to the upstream PITP packet, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
6 months ago
I've got a strategy for this. First, I'll identify the key components and relationships mentioned in the question. Then I'll carefully evaluate each answer choice to see which one logically fits the information provided. Staying calm and methodical is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The key seems to be understanding how the OLT processes the PITP messages from the user side. I'll need to pay close attention to the options and figure out which one best matches the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
6 months ago
Whoa, this is a lot of technical jargon! I'm a bit confused about what's going on with the PITP switch and vendor tags. I'll need to read through this carefully and try to break it down step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
6 months ago
This question looks pretty complex, but I think I can work through it. I'll need to focus on understanding the key details about the PITP switch, vendor tags, and OLT message processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
2 years ago
You know, if the OLT drops those upstream PITP packets, it's gonna be like a giant game of hot potato, but with data. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Haley
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, having the Vendor tag carried in the upstream PITP message is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it would be chaotic if the OLT just dropped the packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option C seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jean
2 years ago
Wait, the OLT adds a local vendor tag? That's wild! I'm going with C just to avoid that vendor tag chaos.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) OLT forwards the USER-side PITP message directly without any processing could also be a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
2 years ago
C is the way to go, folks. Don't want the OLT to be slacking on its vendor tag duties, now do we? Keeps the network running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to go with C as well. Can't have the OLT just dropping those packets! Gotta keep that vendor tag in check.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
2 years ago
Definitely, C is the safest choice to ensure the vendor tag is carried in the upstream PITP message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
2 years ago
Yeah, we can't have the OLT dropping those packets, C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
2 years ago
I agree, C seems like the best option to keep the vendor tag in check.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linn
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) OLT is left with the Vendor tag carried in the upstream PITP message, plus the local Vendor tag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
2 years ago
I agree with Celeste. C is the correct answer. The OLT has to deal with the vendor tag, but it shouldn't be forwarding the user-side PITP message without any processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) OLT adds a local Vendor tag to the upstream PITP packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
2 years ago
Option C seems the most logical to me. The OLT shouldn't be dropping the upstream PITP packets, and it needs to handle the vendor tag appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
1 year ago
OLT forwarding the USER-side PITP message directly doesn't seem right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
1 year ago
OLT adding a local Vendor tag makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
2 years ago
I agree, the OLT should handle the vendor tag in the upstream PITP message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 years ago
I think option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel