Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei H31-311_V2.5 Exam - Topic 6 Question 80 Discussion

When the fiber between node A and node B is disconnected, the RU on node B detects OTS_LOS alarm and will OTS_BDI The ru of the alert inserted into node A of node A forces reports OTS BDI alarms. The board reports och_SSF alarm on the downstream C node.
A) True
B) False

Huawei H31-311_V2.5 Exam - Topic 6 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H31-311_V2.5 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 6
[All H31-311_V2.5 Questions]

When the fiber between node A and node B is disconnected, the RU on node B detects OTS_LOS alarm and will OTS_BDI The ru of the alert inserted into node A of node A forces reports OTS BDI alarms. The board reports och_SSF alarm on the downstream C node.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Gertude
23 days ago
I feel A) True is correct. The cascading alarms are typical in such cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
28 days ago
I'm leaning towards B) False. Maybe the alarms don't trigger like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 month ago
I agree, A) True. Disconnection leads to alarms on both nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
1 month ago
I think it's A) True. The alarms make sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
1 month ago
I feel A) True is right. The RU should report those alarms correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) False. Maybe the alarms don't cascade like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 months ago
I agree, A) True. The disconnection would trigger those alarms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
I think it's A) True. The alarms make sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
2 months ago
I feel A) True is correct. The RU behavior makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) False. Maybe the alarms don't cascade like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 months ago
I agree, A) True. The disconnection would trigger those alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
3 months ago
I think it's A) True. Seems logical with the alarms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
3 months ago
Not sure, this seems a bit confusing to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
3 months ago
Totally agree, the OTS_LOS alarm is a clear indicator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
4 months ago
Wait, so node A triggers alarms on node B? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
5 months ago
I think it's false, the sequence seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
5 months ago
Sounds about right, that's how alarms work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
5 months ago
Not sure, this seems a bit confusing to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
5 months ago
Totally agree, the OTS_LOS alarm is a clear indicator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
5 months ago
Wait, so node A triggers alarms on node B? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
6 months ago
I think it's false, the sequence seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
6 months ago
Sounds about right, that's how alarms work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
6 months ago
I feel like this is a trick question, but I lean towards B since the alarms might not always trigger in that order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the och_SSF alarm on node C. Does it always follow an OTS_BDI alarm?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
6 months ago
I remember a practice question where a similar scenario was discussed, and it involved OTS_LOS leading to OTS_BDI alarms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
6 months ago
I think the answer might be A, but I'm not entirely sure about how the alarms propagate between nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel