Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei Exam H19-424_V1.0 Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H19-424_V1.0 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All H19-424_V1.0 Questions]

WLANR22 Spruce version, the description of the dual-machine hot standby feature is wrong ()

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jamal at Apr 22, 2024, 05:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H19-424_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Raina
3 months ago
I'm just here for the tunnel encryption. Forget the dual-machine hot standby, I want to know how much AES256 I can get for my money!
upvoted 0 times
Malika
2 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
2 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
3 months ago
Ah, Option D, the 'encrypt everything!' approach. While security is important, I don't want to have to worry about managing all that encryption myself. I'd prefer something more plug-and-play.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
3 months ago
Option C seems to address the active/standby state issues, which is a nice feature. But I wonder if it's overkill for my needs. I'd hate to pay for more than I actually need.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
2 months ago
User 3: We should carefully consider if it's worth paying for the extra features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
3 months ago
User 2: I agree, but it might be more than what we actually need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
3 months ago
User 1: Option C sounds like a good feature for active/standby state negotiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabrina
3 months ago
Option B is interesting, but I'm concerned about the 'second-level switching' part. I need something that can handle failover without any noticeable downtime.
upvoted 0 times
Mayra
3 months ago
User 3: I agree, Option A's support for multiple HRP tunnels could help ensure a smoother transition during failover situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
3 months ago
User 2: I see what you mean. Option A does seem like it would provide better failover capabilities without noticeable downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
3 months ago
User 1: Option A sounds like it might be a better fit for you. It supports multiple HRP tunnels for redundancy and high reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myra
4 months ago
Interesting point, Wayne. I can see how that would be important for maintaining stability in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
4 months ago
Option A sounds like it has all the bells and whistles, but I'm not sure if I need all that complexity in my network. I just want something reliable and easy to manage.
upvoted 0 times
Lasandra
2 months ago
Shaunna: Definitely, we don't always need all the extra features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Sometimes simpler is better when it comes to network management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
3 months ago
User 1: Option B sounds like it might be simpler for your needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
3 months ago
User 3: I think simplicity is key when it comes to network management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
4 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Fast switching could be more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
4 months ago
User 1: Option B sounds like it might be simpler for your needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wayne
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C. HRP independently completes the active/standby state negotiation to prevent oscillation in overload conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. The HRP backup tunnel replaces the original V5HSB backup tunnel and supports multiple HRP tunnels for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel