Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei H19-308_V4.0 Exam - Topic 3 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H19-308_V4.0 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 3
[All H19-308_V4.0 Questions]

What are the advantages of object storage over traditional NAS storage? (Select all that apply)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

Huawei documentation highlights several key advantages of object storage for modern data requirements. Option A is correct because object storage primarily uses RESTful APIs (HTTP/HTTPS), which are firewall-friendly and accessible globally over the internet, unlike NFS/CIFS/SMB which are generally restricted to local area networks (LANs).

Option B is correct because object storage allows for extensible metadata. Users can attach custom tags to objects, enabling powerful data searching and automated lifecycle management without needing an external database to track file attributes. Option D is correct because object storage uses a flat namespace rather than the tree-shaped directory structure of NAS. In a flat structure, adding more nodes to the system does not increase the complexity of data retrieval, allowing for nearly infinite horizontal scalability. Option C is incorrect in this context because the tree-shaped directory is actually a limitation of NAS that causes performance degradation at high scales, whereas object storage avoids this hierarchy to improve expansion capabilities.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vivan
1 day ago
All the answers are correct. Object storage is the future, NAS is so last decade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
6 days ago
I prefer object storage over NAS. It's like having a giant filing cabinet instead of a messy desk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
11 days ago
D is also correct. The flat structure of object storage makes it easy to expand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
17 days ago
A and B are correct. Object storage is more flexible and scalable than traditional NAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
22 days ago
I feel like A and B are solid choices, but I’m not convinced about C being an advantage. Isn’t the hierarchical structure more intuitive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
27 days ago
D seems right to me; the flat structure does make it easier to scale, but I’m a bit confused about how that compares to traditional NAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
2 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and B stood out to me because managing metadata seems crucial for object storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
2 months ago
I think A is definitely an advantage since HTTP/HTTPS is widely used, but I'm not sure about C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
2 months ago
The directory structure for object storage is a bit different from NAS, but I think I can explain the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
2 months ago
The HTTP/HTTPS support for object storage is definitely an advantage over traditional NAS. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know object storage is more flexible with metadata, and the flat structure makes it easy to expand. I think I've got a good handle on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about the differences between object storage and NAS. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
3 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel