You know, I'm actually curious to see the real answer. I feel like PostGIS is so robust, it might be able to do all of these things. Guess we'll have to wait and see!
Agree with Veta. Raster processing is not really the focus of PostGIS. If I had to guess, that's the one function it can't handle as well as the others on the list.
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. PostGIS has been expanding its capabilities over the years. I think it can handle raster data these days, even if vector data is its bread and butter.
Haha, tricky question! I bet the answer is C. Raster data processing. PostGIS is great, but it's primarily focused on vector data, not rasters. That's more of a job for GDAL or other specialized tools.
I'm pretty sure PostGIS can handle all of these functions. It's a powerful spatial extension for PostgreSQL, so I don't see why any of these would be off-limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Erick
10 months agoJosphine
10 months agoAshlee
10 months agoErick
10 months agoJosphine
10 months agoErick
11 months agoMichel
11 months agoOcie
11 months agoSharmaine
12 months agoCarey
12 months agoOcie
1 years agoMargarett
1 years agoLonny
11 months agoRoslyn
11 months agoShawnda
12 months agoRolf
1 years agoBlondell
1 years agoVeta
1 years agoAnnabelle
1 years agoHelaine
1 years ago