MENU
In Hadoop, if yam.schedulerxapacity.root.QueueA.minimum-user-limit-percent is set to 50, what is wrong with the following statement?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium H13-711 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
JO
Johnna
1 month ago
C makes sense. More users mean waiting for resources.
JE
Jeannetta
1 month ago
D is definitely incorrect. It says 60%, but the limit is 50%.
AL
Aleshia
1 month ago
A is wrong. A user can't use 100% if the limit is 50%.
RO
Romana
2 months ago
D) is just plain wrong, it says 60% instead of 50%.
RO
Ronald
2 months ago
Wait, how can a user get 100% if there's a limit?
BR
Brice
2 months ago
B) is also wrong, it’s about minimum limits, not caps.
EN
Ena
2 months ago
Totally agree, A) is misleading.
FL
Flo
2 months ago
A) is incorrect, users can't hog all resources.
JU
Justine
2 months ago
I’m confused about D; I thought the minimum limit was 50%, not 60%. That definitely sounds incorrect based on what I studied.
EL
Eladia
3 months ago
I feel like I might have seen a question where if two users are already using resources, a third has to wait. So, C could be correct.
LE
Leanora
3 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where the minimum limit was set, and it restricted users to a certain percentage. So, A seems wrong.
SH
Shelia
3 months ago
I remember something about minimum-user-limit-percent, but I'm not sure if it means users can take all resources if they're the only one.