Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H13-629 Exam - Topic 5 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H13-629 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 5
[All H13-629 Questions]

Client server resources are limited but there is sufficient network bandwidth. What kind of deduplication strategy should be used if the client data needs to be backed up to the physical tape?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Tawny at Jan 25, 2026, 01:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H13-629 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Audria
15 days ago
Surprised to hear incremental is preferred, I always thought it was risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
20 days ago
Really? I thought tape backups needed full deduplication for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
25 days ago
Totally agree with incremental, saves time and space!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
1 month ago
I think full deduplication might be better for tape backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
1 month ago
Incremental deduplication is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 month ago
Source-side deduplication? More like source-side awesome-ification! Amirite?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
2 months ago
Source-side deduplication is the way to go. Ain't nobody got time for network congestion!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
2 months ago
Hmm, source-side deduplication sounds like the best option. Gotta love that reduced network traffic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
Source-side deduplication is the way to go here. Saves network bandwidth and client resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
2 months ago
Definitely go for source-side deduplication to reduce the amount of data sent over the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether source or target deduplication is better in this scenario. I know both have their pros and cons, but I can't remember which one is more efficient for tape backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
2 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I think the key was to balance the deduplication process with the limited resources. Maybe a hybrid approach could work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
3 months ago
I remember something about target deduplication being useful for tape storage, but I can't recall the specifics. Did we cover how it affects backup speed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
3 months ago
I think we might want to consider source deduplication since it reduces the amount of data sent over the network, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option for tape backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
4 months ago
Ah, I see. With the network bandwidth available, server-side deduplication could be the sweet spot to balance client resources and backup efficiency. Time to dig into the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
4 months ago
Server-side deduplication seems like the logical choice given the constraints. I'll need to consider how to optimize the process for backup to tape.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the best approach. Should I focus on minimizing client load or maximizing deduplication efficiency? Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
4 months ago
Okay, let's see. With limited client resources but good network bandwidth, I'm thinking server-side deduplication might be the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the trade-offs between client-side and server-side deduplication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel