Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H13-629 Exam - Topic 1 Question 43 Discussion

In the disaster recovery solutions provided by Huawei in Hong Kong and China in three different centers, which of the following combinations are recommended for the selection of networking and replication technologies?
A) City Ethernet, asynchronous data replication and B) City FC network, synchronous data replication and C) Off-site Ethernet, asynchronous data replication and D) remote FC network, synchronous data replication

Huawei H13-629 Exam - Topic 1 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H13-629 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 1
[All H13-629 Questions]

In the disaster recovery solutions provided by Huawei in Hong Kong and China in three different centers, which of the following combinations are recommended for the selection of networking and replication technologies?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C, D

by Angella at Apr 08, 2024, 07:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H13-629 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Willodean
10 months ago
Remote FC sounds fancy, but is it really necessary?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
10 months ago
I think off-site Ethernet is underrated, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
10 months ago
Wait, why would you choose synchronous? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
Totally agree, async is often more flexible!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
11 months ago
I heard City Ethernet with async replication is a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that remote FC networks are often used for high-speed connections, which might suggest option D could be a good fit for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
11 months ago
I feel like City Ethernet was mentioned in one of our case studies, but I can't recall if it was paired with asynchronous or synchronous replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
11 months ago
I think I came across a practice question that emphasized the importance of using synchronous data replication for critical applications. Maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
12 months ago
I remember studying the differences between synchronous and asynchronous replication, but I'm not sure which one is better for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
12 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking about the recommended combinations for Huawei's disaster recovery solutions in Hong Kong and China specifically, or is it more general? I'll need to read it through a few times to make sure I understand what they're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
12 months ago
This question is right up my alley! I've worked with Huawei's disaster recovery solutions before, so I'm familiar with the networking and replication technologies they typically recommend. I'm feeling pretty confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
12 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy. I'll start by thinking about the pros and cons of synchronous vs. asynchronous data replication, and then match that up with the networking options to see which combination makes the most sense for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between City Ethernet, City FC network, Off-site Ethernet, and remote FC network. I'll need to review those networking technologies before I can confidently select the best combination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
12 months ago
This question seems a bit tricky, but I think I can figure it out. I'll need to carefully consider the networking and replication technologies mentioned and how they might be combined for disaster recovery solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. There are a lot of details to consider, and I'm not sure I fully understand the implications of the stuck thread and the deployment descriptor. I'll need to re-read this a few times to make sure I'm on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
12 months ago
IPsec seems more related to security rather than grouping devices. HSRP doesn't seem right either. Definitely leaning towards VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
12 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which of these options is the most relevant to the project manager's organizational-level responsibilities. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
I'd like to see the answer key before I make a decision. After all, I don't want to end up in a Huawei-led disaster recovery scenario of my own!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
1 year ago
This is a tough one, but I'm going to go with A. City Ethernet and asynchronous replication sounds like a practical and scalable solution for Huawei's needs.
upvoted 0 times
Tess
1 year ago
User 3: City Ethernet and asynchronous data replication do sound like a good combination for the networking and replication technologies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, A seems like a practical option for Huawei's disaster recovery solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
User 1: I think A is the best choice. City Ethernet and asynchronous replication make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cory
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C. Using off-site Ethernet for asynchronous data replication seems like a cost-effective and reliable option for Huawei's disaster recovery solutions.
upvoted 0 times
Trinidad
1 year ago
C) Off-site Ethernet, asynchronous data replication
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
1 year ago
B) City FC network, synchronous data replication
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
1 year ago
A) City Ethernet, asynchronous data replication
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emogene
1 year ago
Hmmm, I'm not sure about this one. I think it might be D, as a remote Fibre Channel network would be a logical choice for synchronous data replication over long distances.
upvoted 0 times
Judy
1 year ago
City Ethernet with asynchronous data replication could also be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
1 year ago
But what about City Ethernet for networking?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 year ago
I agree, remote FC network would be a good option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 year ago
I think D is the correct choice for synchronous data replication over long distances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawn
1 year ago
But what about the networking technology? Should we go with City Ethernet or remote FC network?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B. Huawei's disaster recovery solutions in Hong Kong and China would likely use a high-speed Fibre Channel network for synchronous data replication between centers.
upvoted 0 times
Coleen
1 year ago
I'm not sure about off-site Ethernet with asynchronous replication, it may not be as reliable as Fibre Channel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
1 year ago
City Ethernet with asynchronous replication could also be a good option for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
I agree, using Fibre Channel for synchronous replication makes sense for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 year ago
I think the answer is B. City FC network with synchronous data replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paola
1 year ago
I agree, synchronous replication ensures data consistency across all centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
1 year ago
I think for disaster recovery, we should go with synchronous data replication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel