Enable SmartMigration on OceanStor V3 and start a migration task with SmartMigration. Before migration, suppose the LUN ID and the data volume ID of the source LUN are 1 and 2 respectively while the LUN ID and the data volume ID of the destination LUN are 3 and 4 respectively, what are they after migration?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium H13-629 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
FA
Fallon
12 months ago
I agree with A, it's straightforward after migration.
PA
Paola
12 months ago
Definitely not option D, that's for sure.
EU
Eulah
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems off to me.
AN
Anissa
1 year ago
I think it's option A! Makes the most sense.
LA
Lashawn
1 year ago
The source LUN IDs stay the same, right?
CH
Chuck
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m confused about the data volume IDs. I need to double-check how they are assigned after migration.
MA
Matthew
1 year ago
I thought the destination LUN would take the data volume ID from the source, but I can't recall if it also changes the LUN ID.
TE
Telma
1 year ago
I remember that during migration, the source LUN ID stays the same, but the destination LUN ID changes. So, I think the source LUN should still be 1.
MO
Moira
1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think the data volume IDs might swap between the source and destination. It feels like a similar question we practiced.
RA
Raina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of these options. I know public-key cryptography is different from symmetric-key, but I'm not sure I fully understand the distinctions. I'll have to think this through carefully.
JU
Julio
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the specific features of OceanStor 9000. I'll need to think this through carefully.
WH
Whitney
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand all the relevant cash flows before answering.
JO
Joni
1 year ago
I remember studying that LDP works well with OSPF, but RIPv2 also comes to mind.