U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H13-624 Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

After testing, the bandwidth of the two data centers of the customer is 155Mbit/s, the peak write bandwidth of an application is 9.8MB/s, and the averageThe write bandwidth is 300KB/s, the average write I/O size is 4KB., and the bandwidth utilization rate is 70%. Colleagues choose active and standby synchronous remote replication for disaster recoveryScheme, the scheme:
A) Not feasible, 200Mbit/s is required to calculate the bandwidth. and B) Not feasible. The primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery solution requires that the bandwidth utilization rate must be >80%. and C) Not feasible. The primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery solution requires that the write I/O size must be less than 2KB. and D) Feasible, because the conditions meet the requirements of the primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery program.

Huawei H13-624 Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H13-624 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 1
[All H13-624 Questions]

After testing, the bandwidth of the two data centers of the customer is 155Mbit/s, the peak write bandwidth of an application is 9.8MB/s, and the average

The write bandwidth is 300KB/s, the average write I/O size is 4KB., and the bandwidth utilization rate is 70%. Colleagues choose active and standby synchronous remote replication for disaster recovery

Scheme, the scheme:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C, D

by Xuan at Dec 12, 2023, 10:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H13-624 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jade
7 months ago
I agree with B, the requirements are pretty strict for synchronous replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
7 months ago
Definitely not feasible, we need more bandwidth for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
7 months ago
Wait, does the I/O size really need to be under 2KB? That sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
7 months ago
I think option B makes sense, 80% utilization is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
7 months ago
The bandwidth is only 155Mbit/s, so it seems tight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
8 months ago
I believe the conditions do meet the requirements for synchronous replication, but I need to double-check the bandwidth utilization rate to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
8 months ago
I feel like the write I/O size being less than 2KB is a common requirement for synchronous replication, but I’m not entirely confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
8 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where the bandwidth utilization had to be above 80%. That might be relevant here, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
8 months ago
I remember we discussed bandwidth requirements in class, but I'm not sure if 200Mbit/s is the right calculation for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
8 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. I just need to compare the provided values to the solution's requirements and determine if it meets the criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
8 months ago
Alright, I think I've got this. The question is asking us to evaluate if the synchronous remote replication solution is feasible based on the given parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
8 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The key details I need to focus on are the bandwidth, write bandwidth, and write I/O size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the bandwidth and write requirements to determine if the solution is feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all the technical details here. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and make sure I understand the requirements before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The exhibit shows some performance metrics, but I'm not totally clear on how to interpret them to identify the main source of latency. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the "storage/use type 1" part. Does that mean we need to enhance something specific to that type of entity? I'll have to review my notes on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 year ago
I'm going with option D, but I can't help but think this question is a bit of a bandwidth bandit, trying to trip us up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
1 year ago
Option D all the way! As long as the bandwidth and other conditions are met, it's a no-brainer. Although, I do wonder if the bandwidth was measured in Mbit or MiB. That could make a difference.
upvoted 0 times
Felton
12 months ago
User 3: I think it's feasible too, let's go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
12 months ago
User 2: Agreed, as long as the conditions are met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 year ago
User 1: Option D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the write I/O size requirement. The question says the average write I/O size is 4KB, but option C says it needs to be less than 2KB. Maybe they should have just used a smaller write I/O size for this example.
upvoted 0 times
Lashaunda
1 year ago
User 4: I agree, it's confusing when the options don't match the information given in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, it does seem contradictory. They should have used a smaller write I/O size for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
1 year ago
User 2: Maybe they made a mistake in the question by stating the average write I/O size is 4KB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
1 year ago
User 1: Option C is saying the write I/O size must be less than 2KB.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caitlin
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. The conditions seem to meet the requirements of the primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery program, so it should be feasible.
upvoted 0 times
Willow
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, the conditions seem to align with the requirements for the disaster recovery program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, the conditions seem to align with what is needed for the primary and standby synchronous remote replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D is the way to go. It meets all the requirements for the disaster recovery program.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noah
1 year ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery solution requires a bandwidth utilization rate of over 80%, but the question states it's only 70%, so that's not feasible.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
1 year ago
Lenna: Exactly, the conditions don't meet the requirements for that solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
1 year ago
User 3: So, it's not feasible to choose the primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, the bandwidth utilization rate is only 70% which is below the required 80%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reita
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a possible answer. As long as the conditions meet the requirements, it should be feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 year ago
I agree with Yvonne. If the bandwidth utilization rate is only 70%, then it's not feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
I think the answer is B. The bandwidth utilization rate must be >80% for the solution to work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel