Huawei H13-624 Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H13-624 exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 1

After testing, the bandwidth of the two data centers of the customer is 155Mbit/s, the peak write bandwidth of an application is 9.8MB/s, and the average

The write bandwidth is 300KB/s, the average write I/O size is 4KB., and the bandwidth utilization rate is 70%. Colleagues choose active and standby synchronous remote replication for disaster recovery

Scheme, the scheme:

ANot feasible, 200Mbit/s is required to calculate the bandwidth.

BNot feasible. The primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery solution requires that the bandwidth utilization rate must be >80%.

CNot feasible. The primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery solution requires that the write I/O size must be less than 2KB.

DFeasible, because the conditions meet the requirements of the primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery program.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B, C, D

by Xuan at Dec 12, 2023, 10:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H13-624 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jade

3 months ago

I agree with B, the requirements are pretty strict for synchronous replication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicia

3 months ago

Definitely not feasible, we need more bandwidth for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

3 months ago

Wait, does the I/O size really need to be under 2KB? That sounds odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

4 months ago

I think option B makes sense, 80% utilization is key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Serita

4 months ago

The bandwidth is only 155Mbit/s, so it seems tight.

upvoted 0 times

...

Horace

4 months ago

I believe the conditions do meet the requirements for synchronous replication, but I need to double-check the bandwidth utilization rate to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniela

4 months ago

I feel like the write I/O size being less than 2KB is a common requirement for synchronous replication, but I’m not entirely confident about that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

4 months ago

I think I saw a similar question where the bandwidth utilization had to be above 80%. That might be relevant here, but I can't recall the exact details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

5 months ago

I remember we discussed bandwidth requirements in class, but I'm not sure if 200Mbit/s is the right calculation for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

5 months ago

This seems straightforward to me. I just need to compare the provided values to the solution's requirements and determine if it meets the criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

5 months ago

Alright, I think I've got this. The question is asking us to evaluate if the synchronous remote replication solution is feasible based on the given parameters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

5 months ago

Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The key details I need to focus on are the bandwidth, write bandwidth, and write I/O size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the bandwidth and write requirements to determine if the solution is feasible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julie

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by all the technical details here. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and make sure I understand the requirements before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The exhibit shows some performance metrics, but I'm not totally clear on how to interpret them to identify the main source of latency. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacinta

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the "storage/use type 1" part. Does that mean we need to enhance something specific to that type of entity? I'll have to review my notes on that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

9 months ago

I'm going with option D, but I can't help but think this question is a bit of a bandwidth bandit, trying to trip us up!

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

10 months ago

Option D all the way! As long as the bandwidth and other conditions are met, it's a no-brainer. Although, I do wonder if the bandwidth was measured in Mbit or MiB. That could make a difference.

upvoted 0 times

Felton

8 months ago

User 3: I think it's feasible too, let's go with option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

8 months ago

User 2: Agreed, as long as the conditions are met.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

9 months ago

User 1: Option D all the way!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

10 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the write I/O size requirement. The question says the average write I/O size is 4KB, but option C says it needs to be less than 2KB. Maybe they should have just used a smaller write I/O size for this example.

upvoted 0 times

Lashaunda

9 months ago

User 4: I agree, it's confusing when the options don't match the information given in the question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

9 months ago

User 3: Yeah, it does seem contradictory. They should have used a smaller write I/O size for clarity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

10 months ago

User 2: Maybe they made a mistake in the question by stating the average write I/O size is 4KB.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shanice

10 months ago

User 1: Option C is saying the write I/O size must be less than 2KB.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. The conditions seem to meet the requirements of the primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery program, so it should be feasible.

upvoted 0 times

Willow

9 months ago

User 2: Agreed, the conditions seem to align with the requirements for the disaster recovery program.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katlyn

9 months ago

User 1: I think option D is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bronwyn

9 months ago

User 2: Agreed, the conditions seem to align with what is needed for the primary and standby synchronous remote replication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

10 months ago

User 1: I think option D is the way to go. It meets all the requirements for the disaster recovery program.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

11 months ago

I think option B is the correct answer. The primary and standby synchronous remote replication disaster recovery solution requires a bandwidth utilization rate of over 80%, but the question states it's only 70%, so that's not feasible.

upvoted 0 times