Virtualization is divided into sojourn virtualization, bare metal virtualization and hybrid virtualization. Because sojourn virtualization is simple and easy to implement, it has become the mainstream commercial virtualization ().
I feel like we discussed how hybrid virtualization combines the benefits of both types, but I can’t recall if that makes sojourn the mainstream choice.
I think I came across a practice question that mentioned bare metal virtualization being more efficient for certain applications. Could that be why this statement is wrong?
I'm a bit confused by the terminology used in this question. What exactly is the difference between the types of virtualization mentioned? I'll have to do a quick review of those concepts before answering.
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. The key is focusing on the language used in the passage. Since it says sojourn virtualization "has become the mainstream commercial virtualization", that implies the answer is yes, so I'll go with A.
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The passage doesn't explicitly state that sojourn virtualization is the mainstream commercial virtualization, just that it's simple and easy to implement. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I think I'll go with A since the passage says sojourn virtualization is simple and easy to implement, making it the mainstream commercial option.
Ellen
8 hours agoJaney
6 days agoCory
11 days agoJulieta
16 days agoHerminia
21 days agoGilbert
26 days agoRossana
1 month agoWillard
1 month agoRoselle
1 month agoCharlena
2 months agoKrissy
2 months agoAntonette
2 months agoDelpha
2 months agoAmmie
2 months agoBernardine
3 months agoFabiola
3 months agoMerlyn
3 months agoJesse
3 months agoCheryl
2 months ago