Huawei H12-831_V1.0 Exam - Topic 8 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-831_V1.0 exam

Question #: 58
Topic #: 8

In the multi-level RR scenario, a large number of secondary RRs will be connected to the primary RR, which may lead to BGP of the primary RR. The routing table overflows, what method can be used to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP?

AORF

Broute aggregation

Crouting control

Dset the sameCluster-ID

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Donte at Sep 17, 2024, 08:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-831_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Anglea

10 months ago

Yeah, route aggregation is definitely a solid method!

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

10 months ago

Setting the same Cluster-ID won't help with overflow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

10 months ago

Surprised that people overlook routing control!

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

11 months ago

I disagree, ORF might be more effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

11 months ago

Route aggregation is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Remona

11 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the Cluster-ID option; I don’t think it directly addresses the routing table overflow issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

11 months ago

Route aggregation seems like a solid choice for this scenario, especially since it can simplify the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

11 months ago

I think I saw a practice question about ORF, but I can't recall how it specifically helps with routing table overflow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

12 months ago

I remember studying BGP and how route aggregation can help reduce the number of routes in the table, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

12 months ago

I'm pretty confident about this one. The best approach is to use ORF (Outbound Route Filtering) to selectively receive only the routes the primary RR needs, trimming down the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Van

12 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The answer is route aggregation. By consolidating routes, we can reduce the size of the routing table and prevent overflows.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

12 months ago

This seems like a tricky question, but I think I can work through it. The key is to focus on reducing the routing table size on the primary RR.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

12 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the multi-level RR scenario. I'll need to review my notes on BGP and routing table management to figure this one out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Octavio

12 months ago

I'm a bit unsure, but I think it's important to consider how search engines might index the data we make public.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dylan

2 years ago

Hey, I heard the primary RR was really feeling the heat from all those secondary RRs. Maybe we should just tell it to take a nice, long vacation. That would solve the problem, right?

upvoted 0 times

Frankie

2 years ago

C) routing control

upvoted 0 times

...

Karl

2 years ago

B) route aggregation

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

2 years ago

A) ORF

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

2 years ago

ORF? Really? That's just the Outbound Route Filtering feature, not the solution to this problem. Gotta go with B) route aggregation on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Rebeca

2 years ago

User 3: Agreed, route aggregation is the method to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracie

2 years ago

User 2: Gracie is right. B) route aggregation is the way to go in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

2 years ago

ORF? Really? That's just the Outbound Route Filtering feature, not the solution to this problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

2 years ago

D) set the sameCluster-ID seems like a weird choice. How is that going to help with the routing table overflow issue? I'm sticking with B) route aggregation.

upvoted 0 times

James

2 years ago

B) Yeah, route aggregation seems like the most practical solution in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

2 years ago

C) Routing control might provide some additional options for managing the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicente

2 years ago

B) Agreed, route aggregation can definitely help in reducing the size of the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

2 years ago

A) ORF could also be a good option to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

2 years ago

The correct answer is B) route aggregation. That's the best way to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP in a multi-level RR scenario.

upvoted 0 times

Lorenza

2 years ago

B) route aggregation

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

2 years ago

A) ORF

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) routing control could also be a valid method to reduce the risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Douglass

2 years ago

I'm going with C) routing control. It sounds like it could help manage the large number of secondary RRs and prevent the routing table from overflowing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

2 years ago

I agree with Brittni, route aggregation can help reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

2 years ago

I think the answer is B) route aggregation.

upvoted 0 times

...