Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei Exam H12-831_V1.0 Topic 8 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-831_V1.0 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 8
[All H12-831_V1.0 Questions]

In the multi-level RR scenario, a large number of secondary RRs will be connected to the primary RR, which may lead to BGP of the primary RR. The routing table overflows, what method can be used to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Donte at Sep 17, 2024, 08:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-831_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dylan
10 months ago
Hey, I heard the primary RR was really feeling the heat from all those secondary RRs. Maybe we should just tell it to take a nice, long vacation. That would solve the problem, right?
upvoted 0 times
Frankie
9 months ago
C) routing control
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
9 months ago
B) route aggregation
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
9 months ago
A) ORF
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
10 months ago
ORF? Really? That's just the Outbound Route Filtering feature, not the solution to this problem. Gotta go with B) route aggregation on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Rebeca
9 months ago
User 3: Agreed, route aggregation is the method to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
9 months ago
User 2: Gracie is right. B) route aggregation is the way to go in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
10 months ago
ORF? Really? That's just the Outbound Route Filtering feature, not the solution to this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickolas
11 months ago
D) set the sameCluster-ID seems like a weird choice. How is that going to help with the routing table overflow issue? I'm sticking with B) route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
James
10 months ago
B) Yeah, route aggregation seems like the most practical solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
10 months ago
C) Routing control might provide some additional options for managing the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
10 months ago
B) Agreed, route aggregation can definitely help in reducing the size of the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
10 months ago
A) ORF could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
11 months ago
The correct answer is B) route aggregation. That's the best way to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP in a multi-level RR scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Lorenza
11 months ago
B) route aggregation
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
11 months ago
A) ORF
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Portia
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) routing control could also be a valid method to reduce the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
11 months ago
I'm going with C) routing control. It sounds like it could help manage the large number of secondary RRs and prevent the routing table from overflowing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
11 months ago
I agree with Brittni, route aggregation can help reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel