Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H12-831_V1.0 Exam - Topic 8 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-831_V1.0 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 8
[All H12-831_V1.0 Questions]

In the multi-level RR scenario, a large number of secondary RRs will be connected to the primary RR, which may lead to BGP of the primary RR. The routing table overflows, what method can be used to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Donte at Sep 17, 2024, 08:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-831_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Anglea
4 months ago
Yeah, route aggregation is definitely a solid method!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
5 months ago
Setting the same Cluster-ID won't help with overflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
5 months ago
Surprised that people overlook routing control!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
5 months ago
I disagree, ORF might be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
5 months ago
Route aggregation is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the Cluster-ID option; I don’t think it directly addresses the routing table overflow issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
6 months ago
Route aggregation seems like a solid choice for this scenario, especially since it can simplify the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
6 months ago
I think I saw a practice question about ORF, but I can't recall how it specifically helps with routing table overflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
6 months ago
I remember studying BGP and how route aggregation can help reduce the number of routes in the table, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The best approach is to use ORF (Outbound Route Filtering) to selectively receive only the routes the primary RR needs, trimming down the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The answer is route aggregation. By consolidating routes, we can reduce the size of the routing table and prevent overflows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky question, but I think I can work through it. The key is to focus on reducing the routing table size on the primary RR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the multi-level RR scenario. I'll need to review my notes on BGP and routing table management to figure this one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I think it's important to consider how search engines might index the data we make public.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
1 year ago
Hey, I heard the primary RR was really feeling the heat from all those secondary RRs. Maybe we should just tell it to take a nice, long vacation. That would solve the problem, right?
upvoted 0 times
Frankie
1 year ago
C) routing control
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
1 year ago
B) route aggregation
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
A) ORF
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
2 years ago
ORF? Really? That's just the Outbound Route Filtering feature, not the solution to this problem. Gotta go with B) route aggregation on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Rebeca
1 year ago
User 3: Agreed, route aggregation is the method to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 year ago
User 2: Gracie is right. B) route aggregation is the way to go in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
ORF? Really? That's just the Outbound Route Filtering feature, not the solution to this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickolas
2 years ago
D) set the sameCluster-ID seems like a weird choice. How is that going to help with the routing table overflow issue? I'm sticking with B) route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
James
2 years ago
B) Yeah, route aggregation seems like the most practical solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
2 years ago
C) Routing control might provide some additional options for managing the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
2 years ago
B) Agreed, route aggregation can definitely help in reducing the size of the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
2 years ago
A) ORF could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
2 years ago
The correct answer is B) route aggregation. That's the best way to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP in a multi-level RR scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Lorenza
2 years ago
B) route aggregation
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 years ago
A) ORF
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Portia
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) routing control could also be a valid method to reduce the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
2 years ago
I'm going with C) routing control. It sounds like it could help manage the large number of secondary RRs and prevent the routing table from overflowing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
2 years ago
I agree with Brittni, route aggregation can help reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) route aggregation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel