New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei H12-831_V1.0 Exam - Topic 1 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-831_V1.0 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 1
[All H12-831_V1.0 Questions]

The router ID of R4 is 10.0.4.4. The LSA shown in the figure is displayed in the LSDB of R4.

Which of the following statements are true about the LSA?

A. The three LSAs belong to area 1. B. Area 1 is a stub area. C. No OSPFv3 neighbor relationship is established on at least one link of R4. D. R4 is the DR on a link.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Veronique
3 months ago
D is spot on, Network-LSAs mean R4 is the DR for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
3 months ago
C makes sense, no neighbor means something's off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
3 months ago
Wait, how can R4 be the DR? I thought it needed more neighbors!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
4 months ago
I disagree with B, there's no evidence of it being a stub area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
4 months ago
A is definitely true, all LSAs are for Area 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
4 months ago
I think I recall that if there's a Router-LSA, it might mean no neighbor relationship exists, but I’m not completely clear on how to interpret that in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
4 months ago
I feel confident that R4 is the DR based on the LSAs shown, but I need to double-check what it means for an area to be a stub.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify the router ID and its LSAs, and I think I got confused about whether a stub area can have Type 2 LSAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
5 months ago
I remember studying the types of LSAs, and I think the presence of Network-LSAs indicates R4 is the DR, but I'm not entirely sure about the stub area concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to review the OSPF concepts around LSAs and areas to make sure I'm interpreting everything correctly. Gotta be careful on the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The LSA details give me the information I need to evaluate each statement. I just need to take my time and not rush.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The LSDB data seems complex, and I'll need to really focus to make sure I understand all the implications before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
5 months ago
This question looks pretty straightforward. I think I can handle it - the key is to carefully analyze the information provided in the LSA details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, so I'll need to really read through the descriptions to try to identify the right API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know internal auditors are supposed to highlight issues, but I'm not sure if recommending a consulting firm would be considered appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
10 months ago
Designated Router? More like Designated Roofer, amirite?
upvoted 0 times
Evette
9 months ago
Looks like R4 has some important responsibilities in this network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
9 months ago
Yeah, R4 is the DR on a link according to the LSAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
9 months ago
Haha, Designated Roofer, I like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deandrea
10 months ago
No OSPFv3 neighbor relationship? I bet someone's router is having a bad day.
upvoted 0 times
Leana
9 months ago
Hopefully they can troubleshoot and get it resolved quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
9 months ago
It could be a configuration problem or a physical issue with the link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
9 months ago
That's right, no OSPFv3 neighbor relationship means there might be some network issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tuyet
10 months ago
R4 must be the DR for that link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
10 months ago
Yes, since it's the origin of the Network-LSA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
10 months ago
Stub area? Really? I guess they're trying to trick us. Good thing I read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Haydee
8 months ago
For sure, always important to carefully read and interpret the information given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
9 months ago
Definitely, the key was in analyzing the LSAs and the network setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
9 months ago
I know, but it was a good thing we paid attention to the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
10 months ago
Yeah, they tried to throw us off with that stub area option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Refugia
10 months ago
And is R4 the DR on a link?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
10 months ago
That's right. R4 has a link with no OSPFv3 adjacency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
10 months ago
There's at least one link with no neighbor on R4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
10 months ago
I see. What about the OSPFv3 neighbor relationship on R4?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
10 months ago
Exactly, stub areas don't receive Type 5 LSAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
10 months ago
No, there's no indication that it's a stub area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
10 months ago
But is Area 1 a stub area?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
10 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The LSAs are all for Area 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
11 months ago
I think the LSAs belong to area 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
11 months ago
Yes, one of the LSAs indicates that. R4 must have a link with no neighbor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
11 months ago
Do you think R4 has no OSPFv3 neighbor on at least one link?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
11 months ago
Area 1? I thought it was Area 0.0.0.1. Looks like someone needs to brush up on their OSPF knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Lottie
9 months ago
The presence of Network-LSAs (Type 2) indicates that a multi-access link exists. Statement D is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
9 months ago
One LSA references a Router-LSA, while two reference Network-LSAs. Statement C is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
10 months ago
The table explicitly shows 'Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA (Area 0.0.0.1)', meaning all LSAs are for Area 1. Statement A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
10 months ago
I thought it was Area 0.0.0.1. Looks like someone needs to brush up on their OSPF knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edda
11 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The LSAs are for Area 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
11 months ago
I think the LSAs belong to area 1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel