Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei Exam H12-831_V1.0 Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-831_V1.0 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 1
[All H12-831_V1.0 Questions]

On the IS-IS IPv6 network shown in the figure, multi-topology is enabled on all routers. The IPv6 address of Loopback0 on R4 is 2000::/128. The IPv6 summary 2000::/64 level-1-2 command is configured in the IS-IS processes of R2 and R1. Which of the following statements is false?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C, D

by Maile at Mar 17, 2024, 09:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-831_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mindy
14 days ago
Alright, let's think this through. If multi-topology is enabled, then the routers should have separate routing tables for IPv4 and IPv6. So the answer has to be option C, the routing table of R3 contains the route 2000::/128.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
16 days ago
Haha, I bet the guy who wrote this question is just trying to trip us up with that 2000::/128 route on R3. Nice try, but I'm not falling for it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
28 days ago
I'm pretty sure the routing table of R1 and R2 should both contain the route 2000::/64 since they have the summary command configured.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
11 hours ago
So, R3 should have the route 2000::/128 in its routing table, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
2 days ago
Yes, that's correct. The summary command creates a summary route for the specified prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
14 days ago
R1 and R2 should both have the route 2000::/64 in their routing tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
1 months ago
I believe option C is false. R3 should have the route 2000::/64.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
1 months ago
I agree with Jutta. R2 should not have the route 2000::/128.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
1 months ago
Wait, why would the routing table of R3 contain the route 2000::/128? That doesn't make sense, since the summary command is configured only on R1 and R2.
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
6 days ago
That could be possible, R3 might have another source for that specific route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
9 days ago
Maybe R3 learned about the /128 route through a different protocol or interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
17 days ago
R3 might still have the /128 route if there's another way for it to learn about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
19 days ago
R1 and R2 have the summary command, so R3 shouldn't have the /128 route.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jutta
1 months ago
I think the false statement is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel