New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei H12-821_V1.0 Exam - Topic 1 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-821_V1.0 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 1
[All H12-821_V1.0 Questions]

On an OSPF network, one router with P2P as the network type is directly connected to another router with P2MP as the network type. If the Hello intervals on the two routers are changed to be the same, neighbor relationship establishment and LSDB synchronization are not affected.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Santos
3 months ago
Are you sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
3 months ago
Just a fact, P2P and P2MP can coexist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
3 months ago
Wait, really? I thought they had to match!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
4 months ago
I disagree, the network types matter too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
That's true, Hello intervals don't affect LSDB sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
4 months ago
I recall that OSPF is pretty flexible, but I’m not confident if it applies here. I might go with TRUE since they can still sync despite the different types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused because I thought the Hello intervals needed to match for neighbor relationships, but maybe that only applies to the same network type?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where changing Hello intervals did affect the LSDB synchronization, so I’m leaning towards FALSE for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
5 months ago
I think I remember that OSPF can establish neighbor relationships even with different network types, but I'm not sure if the Hello intervals really matter in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The question states that the neighbor relationship and LSDB synchronization are not affected, so the answer must be TRUE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
5 months ago
I've seen questions like this before. As long as the Hello intervals are the same, the different network types shouldn't prevent the neighbor relationship from forming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Aren't the network types supposed to match for OSPF neighbors? I'm not sure about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the network types are different, so the Hello interval shouldn't matter for the neighbor relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the OSPF neighbor relationship requirements carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Can you really just shorten the package path like that? I'm not sure option C is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I remember learning about the different components that are automatically generated, and I think A is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the relationship behavior type, and it seems like we need to ensure that the child records are updated when the parent record's owner changes. Based on that, I think the answer is Parental.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
10 months ago
Haha, good one Paulina! I'll go with TRUE too, just to see the instructor's face when I hand in that answer.
upvoted 0 times
Lonny
8 months ago
I'm curious to see the instructor's reaction when we hand in that answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Let's go with TRUE and see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
9 months ago
I think it's TRUE because the Hello intervals are the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulina
10 months ago
Hold on, isn't this a trick question? I bet the answer is TRUE, and the routers will magically become best friends regardless of the network type mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
Lili
8 months ago
B) FALSE
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
8 months ago
I think you're right, the Hello intervals being the same should allow the routers to establish a neighbor relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
8 months ago
A) TRUE
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catina
10 months ago
Hmm, you're right. I think the key here is that the network types are different, which can cause issues with OSPF adjacency formation and LSDB sync.
upvoted 0 times
Demetra
9 months ago
I think it's FALSE because different network types can impact neighbor relationship establishment and LSDB synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
9 months ago
I agree, the different network types can cause problems with OSPF adjacency and LSDB sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
9 months ago
B) FALSE
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
10 months ago
A) TRUE
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anna
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure that's FALSE. The network types being different would affect the neighbor relationship, even if the Hello intervals are the same.
upvoted 0 times
Vashti
8 months ago
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
8 months ago
I still believe that the network types being different would cause an issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
9 months ago
But the question says if the Hello intervals are the same, it wouldn't be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
10 months ago
I think you're right, the network types being different would definitely affect the neighbor relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammara
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but it makes sense that if the Hello intervals are the same, the routers should still be able to establish neighbor relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
11 months ago
I agree with Tien, because the Hello intervals being the same should not affect neighbor relationship establishment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) TRUE.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel