New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei H12-821_V1.0 Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-821_V1.0 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 1
[All H12-821_V1.0 Questions]

Which of the following statements regarding the stateful inspection firewall is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Erick at Jul 05, 2023, 09:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-821_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shanda
3 months ago
A seems wrong, they do correlate packets in a connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
3 months ago
Wait, I thought stateful firewalls tracked all packets?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
4 months ago
B is spot on, UDP is tricky for stateful firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
4 months ago
I disagree with D, that's not how stateful firewalls operate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
4 months ago
C is definitely true! That's how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
4 months ago
I recall that stateful firewalls track connections, so option A seems incorrect. They definitely correlate packets from the same connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the firewall's behavior was discussed, and I feel like option D is wrong since stateful firewalls usually don't check every packet against the rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about UDP being tricky for stateful firewalls. Maybe option B is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
5 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar because it mentions matching the first data packet and then using the state table for the rest. That seems right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is the WBS just for the overall project, or does it include the individual tasks as well? I'll need to review my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
5 months ago
Alright, I've got it. The issue is that PE1 can't see the VPNv4 routes because it only has an iBGP relationship with Router 1, which is a route reflector client. The solution is to configure Router 1 as a route reflector for PE1 under the VPNv4 address family. That should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the difference between the http and ssl persistence options. I'll need to review those in more detail to make sure I select the right one for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
I recall something about insulation being problematic at lower temps too, but 25 F to 250 F feels off. I lean towards the higher range options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
10 months ago
Man, I'm glad I read through the options carefully. If I just saw 'stateful firewall' and picked the first answer, I would have been way off base. This stuff really requires understanding the core concepts.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
9 months ago
Yeah, it's important to pay attention to the details. The stateful inspection firewall works differently than just matching rules for each incoming packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
9 months ago
C) The stateful inspection firewall only needs to match the first data packet against a rule, and the subsequent packets of the connection are matched directly in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
10 months ago
A) When the stateful inspection firewall checks packets, packets of one same connection are not correlated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hildegarde
10 months ago
Option D sounds like it would be super inefficient. Matching every single packet against the full rule set? No way, that's not how a stateful firewall works at all.
upvoted 0 times
Chuck
8 months ago
C) The stateful inspection firewall only needs to match the first data packet against a rule, and the subsequent packets of the connection are matched directly in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
8 months ago
B) Because UDP is a connectionless protocol, so the stateful inspection firewall cannot match UDP packets with the status table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
8 months ago
A) When the stateful inspection firewall checks packets, packets of one same connection are not correlated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
8 months ago
C) The stateful inspection firewall only needs to match the first data packet against a rule, and the subsequent packets of the connection are matched directly in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
10 months ago
B) Because UDP is a connectionless protocol, so the stateful inspection firewall cannot match UDP packets with the status table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
10 months ago
A) When the stateful inspection firewall checks packets, packets of one same connection are not correlated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
10 months ago
Haha, option A is pretty funny. Of course the stateful firewall correlates packets of the same connection, that's the whole reason it's called 'stateful'!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
10 months ago
I was a bit confused by option B. Just because UDP is connectionless, it doesn't mean the stateful firewall can't track and match UDP packets based on the connection state. That's kind of the whole point of stateful inspection!
upvoted 0 times
Lyla
9 months ago
User 2: That's right, the stateful inspection firewall can match UDP packets based on the connection state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
10 months ago
User 1: Option B is incorrect because the stateful inspection firewall can still track UDP packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Galen
10 months ago
But C makes sense because it would be more efficient to match subsequent packets directly in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
10 months ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. The stateful inspection firewall keeps track of the connection state, so it only needs to match the first packet against the rules, and then can quickly match subsequent packets in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
11 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
11 months ago
But C makes sense because it would be more efficient to match subsequent packets directly in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
11 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel