Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Huawei Exam H12-261 Topic 6 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-261 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 6
[All H12-261 Questions]

The following is true about the virtual road description is the OSPF ? chain

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Harrison at Apr 11, 2024, 01:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-261 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bernardine
10 months ago
I trust David's judgment on this one. I'll go with A) TRUE as well. It makes sense that they can work together to create the binding entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
10 months ago
I've read about this before and I'm pretty sure the answer is A) TRUE. When configured correctly, IPSG and DHCP Snooping can indeed generate static binding entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
10 months ago
That's an interesting point, Maybe we should look into the details of how IPSG and DHCP Snooping interact to confirm the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
10 months ago
I'm not so sure about that, I think the answer might be B) FALSE because I believe IPSG static binding entries cannot be generated when working with DHCP Snooping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
10 months ago
I agree with A) TRUE seems like the correct answer since IPSG and DHCP Snooping can work together to generate the binding entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) TRUE because IPSG static binding entries can indeed be configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
11 months ago
But the question doesn't say static binding entries can be configured when using both, it just says they can be generated
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
11 months ago
I disagree, I think it's FALSE because static binding entries cannot be configured when using both IPSG and DHCP Snooping
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
11 months ago
I also believe it's TRUE because IPSG and DHCP Snooping can work together to generate static binding entries
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
1 years ago
I think it's TRUE
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
1 years ago
Haha, Val, you're killing me with that conspiracy theory! But seriously, I'm leaning towards 'true' as well. It just makes sense that IPSG and DHCP Snooping would work together to automate the binding process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
1 years ago
I think we should just go with 'true' and move on. This is a certification exam, they're not trying to trick us, right? *chuckles* Or are they... *raises eyebrows mysteriously*
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I thought IPSG was more about restricting access based on IP and MAC addresses, rather than generating the bindings themselves. Anyone have a good reference we can check?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
1 years ago
Yeah, I agree with Dominga. IPSG and DHCP Snooping are often used together to enhance network security. The IPSG static binding entries can be configured manually, but they can also be automatically generated based on the information gathered by DHCP Snooping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 years ago
Well, from what I understand, IPSG is used to prevent IP address spoofing, and DHCP Snooping can help with that by tracking IP-to-MAC address bindings. So, I'd say the statement is probably true, but I'm not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
1 years ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the relationship between IPSG and DHCP Snooping. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
upvoted 0 times
Lashandra
11 months ago
I agree with Rene, it's TRUE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
11 months ago
No, I believe it's FALSE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
12 months ago
I think the statement is TRUE.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel