customer's requirements]
Refer to exhibit from a customer's Aruba CX switch.
show interface vxlan vni vteps
VNI : 150 VLAN : 150
Routing : Disabled VRF : default
Vxlan-status : operational
VTEPs
Origin Source Destination VTEP-STATUS
static 172.17.255.2 172.17.255.1 static operational
Which statement is true in this scenario?
The correct answer is A. The switch output clearly identifies the VTEP origin as ''static,'' and the VNI is mapped to VLAN 150 with routing disabled. In ArubaOS-CX static VXLAN, the administrator manually configures the VXLAN interface, source IP address, VNI, and peer VTEP. Aruba documentation for static VXLAN states that the peer VTEP IP address is explicitly defined with the vtep-peer command. Option B describes EVPN-VXLAN behavior, where BGP EVPN is used as the control plane to advertise MAC/IP and VTEP reachability dynamically. That is not what the output shows; the displayed origin is static. Option C is unsupported by the exhibit because no license state or scale limit is shown. Option D is incorrect because VXLAN interoperability depends on protocol support, configuration, MTU, underlay reachability, and feature compatibility, not on both sites using the exact same CX switch model. Reference/topics: ArubaOS-CX VXLAN, static VTEP configuration, VNI-to-VLAN mapping, underlay/overlay validation.
Your customer is planning to deploy several HPE ProLiant DL360 Gen11 servers with Windows Server 2025, for a bare-metal use case with no hypervisors.
The customer is concerned about the time it takes to scan and deploy the servers for new firmware and driver updates.
What HPE management tool can be used in this scenario to apply firmware updates to servers, with direct integration to HPE repositories?
The correct answer is B. HPE Compute Ops Management is the correct cloud-based management service for fleet-level HPE ProLiant lifecycle operations, including firmware baseline management and update execution. HPE describes Compute Ops Management as supporting HPE ProLiant ML/DL/MicroServer Gen10, Gen10 Plus, and Gen11 servers with iLO 5 and later, and includes automatic firmware-baseline update capability. HPE also provides firmware-update workflows for servers managed by Compute Ops Management. This fits the scenario precisely: bare-metal DL360 Gen11 servers, Windows Server installed directly, no hypervisor layer, and a requirement to reduce the operational time required to scan and deploy firmware/driver updates. HPE OneView is better suited for infrastructure managed through OneView domains and profiles, especially composable or converged environments. HPE iLO Amplifier is not the current strategic answer for GreenLake-era ProLiant fleet lifecycle management. Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can manage operating system software, but it is not the HPE-native server firmware lifecycle tool with direct HPE repository integration. Reference/topics: HPE Compute Ops Management, ProLiant Gen11 lifecycle management, firmware baselines, HPE GreenLake cloud operations.
Your customer is planning a Scality RING solution. Approximately 750 TB of data must be stored on the SDS. The customer prefers SSD or NVMe drives.
What is true regarding this solution?
The correct answer is A because Scality RING is positioned by HPE as a scale-out object and file storage solution built on qualified HPE server platforms, including HPE Alletra Storage Server models. For a customer planning approximately 750 TB of usable software-defined storage, the design focus is the validated HPE server configuration, drive type, usable-capacity target, and Scality license sizing. HPE documentation describes the Scality RING solution as consisting of HPE server systems, Scality license and maintenance, and installation services, with licensing based on unique usable data capacity. The minimum RING configuration is not 1000 TB; HPE references a lower starting usable-capacity threshold, so option B is incorrect. Option D is also incorrect because Scality solutions and licenses are explicitly available through HPE solution packaging. Option C is not the best design statement for this customer use case because the key technical validation is platform support and capacity alignment, not a generic claim about lower-cost licensing. This maps directly to the course topic covering scale-out unstructured data platforms, including Scality, Qumulo, Cohesity, and related HPE storage-server designs.
Your customer is considering HPE Nimble or HPE Primera for use as a Peer Persistence enabled platform for their critical workloads.
Which statement about these platforms and their benefits is true for Peer Persistence?
The correct answer is D. HPE Primera Peer Persistence and Active Peer Persistence designs use HPE Quorum Witness to support automatic failover decisions between arrays. The Quorum Witness is deployed as a virtual appliance, typically from an OVA image, and is placed in a third failure domain so that it can arbitrate between the two storage systems during communication or site-failure scenarios. HPE identifies Quorum Witness as a necessary component for automatic failover between arrays in Peer Persistence and Active Peer Persistence configurations. Option A is incorrect because Nimble/Alletra 6000 Peer Persistence does not make the protected volume independently active through the target array in the same active-active manner. Option B is incorrect because ''Active Peer Persistence'' is associated with Primera/Alletra 9000/B10000-class designs, not classic Nimble terminology. Option C mixes terms: Nimble uses a Witness service for ASO behavior, but ''Quorum Witness via OVA'' is the precise Primera-style statement. Reference/topics: Peer Persistence, Active Peer Persistence, HPE Primera, Quorum Witness, failure-domain arbitration.
A customer is about to do a server refresh with the intent of using HPE ProLiant DL360 Gen11 servers, with CPUs exceeding 270 watt power usage. The customer has existing third-party, 42U, air-cooled racks they are planning to reuse.
Which cooling option will allow your customer to install the servers with their existing racks, with the least amount of changes to the setup?
The correct answer is B because the CPU power level exceeds the range normally handled by standard or high-performance air-cooling options for this server design. For HPE ProLiant DL360 Gen11 configurations with very high-wattage processors, HPE design guidance identifies closed-loop liquid cooling as the required or appropriate cooling mechanism for processors at or above the higher thermal threshold. The key phrase in the scenario is that the customer wants to reuse existing third-party, 42U, air-cooled racks with the least amount of change. Closed-loop liquid cooling is self-contained inside the server cooling assembly and does not require the customer to deploy facility-level liquid-cooled racks or direct-liquid-cooling infrastructure. Option A introduces a larger rack and facility change, which violates the ''least amount of changes'' requirement. Option C implies external liquid-cooling infrastructure and is therefore more disruptive. Option D is incorrect because high-performance fans are intended for lower thermal design power ranges and are not sufficient for CPUs exceeding the stated 270-watt threshold. This aligns with the course's ProLiant Gen11/Gen12 server design and validation objectives.
Saad Kazmi
19 days agoYuna Hoang
24 days agoPatricia Smith
2 months agoGaurav Rao
2 months agoLisa Wilson
3 months agoManon Simon
3 months ago