MENU
Exhibit.
After configuring VRRP between sw-1 and SW-2. you notice that both switches are showing as active. What could be the reason for this issue?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium HPE7-A07 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
In VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol), only one switch should be the primary (master) for a given virtual IP address, with the other switches being backups. If both switches are showing as active, it suggests a misconfiguration where both are set to act as the primary for the same VRRP group. The exhibits provided indicate that both switches believe they are the active or primary for the VRRP group, which is an incorrect configuration.
24 comments · newest first
CH
Cherilyn
11 months ago
SW-2 not having priority set is a big red flag!
NA
Nan
11 months ago
VRRP preemptive mode being off can cause confusion too.
RO
Rosalia
11 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? Could it be something else?
TA
Tasia
12 months ago
Totally agree, option C is the issue here.
JU
Junita
12 months ago
Both switches can't be primary, that's a classic mistake.
SA
Sabra
12 months ago
I vaguely remember that if both switches are configured the same way, it could lead to this situation. Maybe they are both set as primary?
IS
Isabelle
1 year ago
I feel like the priority settings on SW-2 could be the problem, but I can't recall if that alone would cause both to show as active.
SH
Shanda
1 year ago
I think I saw a similar question where both switches were active because they were both set as primary. That might be the issue here too.
KA
Karl
1 year ago
I remember something about VRRP configurations, but I'm not sure if preemptive mode being disabled would cause both switches to be active.
BE
Beatriz
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. The issue is likely that both switches are configured as VRRP 'primary.' I'll need to ensure that only one switch is set as the primary, and the other is configured as the backup.
ET
Ettie
1 year ago
Ah, I see. If SW-2 doesn't have any priority configurations for VRRP 1, that could be the reason why both switches are active. I'll verify the VRRP configurations on both devices.
LO
Lorita
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused here. Is it possible that VRRP preemptive mode is disabled? That could be causing the problem. I'll make sure to check that setting.
FR
Frederic
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. If both switches are configured as primary, that would explain the issue. I'll double-check the VRRP priority settings on each switch.
AL
Alline
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully review the VRRP configuration details to figure out why both switches are showing as active.
LA
Lajuana
1 year ago
Wait, what? Resize the logical volume and filesystem? I'm not sure I understand how to do that. I'll need to review the lecture notes and examples again to make sure I'm doing this correctly.
FR
Francisca
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The question is asking for valid commands, so I'll need to focus on the specific syntax and capabilities of EOS 4.14.
DO
Dominque
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know "intra-" means inside, but I'm not totally clear on the different tissue spaces in the body. I'll have to think this through carefully.
WI
William
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards D) SW-2 has no priority configurations for VRRP 1.
CA
Cammy
2 years ago
That could be a possibility, but I still believe it's A)
CH
Chandra
2 years ago
But what if the reason is B) SW-1 can reach SW-2 on VLAN 10?
CA
Cammy
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) VRRP preemptive mode is disabled.
TH
Theodora
3 years ago
Maybe both switches are configured as VRRP 'primary'.
CH
Chau
3 years ago
Perhaps SW-1 can reach SW-2 on VLAN 10.
ES
Essie
3 years ago
I think the reason could be VRRP preemptive mode is disabled.