Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE7-A04 Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A04 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 3
[All HPE7-A04 Questions]

You are planning to use distributed routing for overlay subnets in an EVPN VXLAN fabric. The customer needs to provide DHCP addresses to some VMs in the tenant-a VRF. The DHCP server is in the shared VRF. What is one step you should take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sherly at Jan 14, 2025, 11:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE7-A04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Haydee
4 months ago
Option C all the way! Now, if only we could get the DHCP server to serve up some free wifi while we're at it. A guy can dream, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
4 months ago
I'm no EVPN expert, but I'm pretty sure C is the way to go here. Centralized routing? Nah, that's so last year.
upvoted 0 times
Marva
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Centralized routing is not the way to go. Creating a loopback interface in the shared VRF on each VTEP switch seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
4 months ago
I think C is the best option here. Creating a loopback interface in the shared VRF on each VTEP switch sounds like the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chun
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is a real networking wizard. But I'm going with C as well. Gotta love those loopback interfaces!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
4 months ago
Hmm, option C looks good to me. Seems like the best way to ensure the DHCP server in the shared VRF can communicate with the VMs in the tenant-a VRF.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
3 months ago
User 3: Agreed, that would help with communication between the DHCP server and the VMs in the tenant-a VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
4 months ago
User 2: Yeah, creating a loopback interface in the shared VRF on each VTEP switch makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
4 months ago
User 1: I think option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reuben
5 months ago
That's a good point, Sheridan. Option B could also help with troubleshooting and isolating any issues that may arise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
Well, that's a tricky one. I think the answer is C. Creating a loopback interface in the shared VRF with the same IP on both switches seems like the logical way to handle the DHCP server in the shared VRF.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
4 months ago
Definitely. It's a crucial step to take when planning to use distributed routing for overlay subnets in an EVPN VXLAN fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
4 months ago
I agree. It's important to have that consistency for the DHCP server to function properly in the shared VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
4 months ago
That makes sense. Having the same IP on both switches in a VSX pair would ensure consistency for the DHCP server in the shared VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
4 months ago
I think the answer is C. Creating a loopback interface in the shared VRF with the same IP on both switches seems like the logical way to handle the DHCP server in the shared VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more suitable as it allows for unique IP addresses for each SVI, preventing any potential conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
5 months ago
I think option C is the best choice because it ensures the DHCP server in the shared VRF can reach the VMs in the tenant-a VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel