New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE6-A85 Exam - Topic 9 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A85 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 9
[All HPE6-A85 Questions]

A hospital uses a lot of mobile equipment for the diagnosis and documentation of patient data What Is the ideal access switch for this large hospital with distribution racks of over 400 ports in a single VSF stack?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The ideal access switch for a large hospital with distribution racks of over 400 ports in a single VSF stack is the CX 6300. This switch provides the following benefits:

The CX 6300 supports up to 48 ports per switch and up to 10 switches per VSF stack, allowing for a total of 480 ports in a single stack. This meets the requirement of having over 400 ports in a single VSF stack.

The CX 6300 supports high-performance switching with up to 960 Gbps of switching capacity and up to 714 Mpps of forwarding rate. This meets the requirement of having high throughput and low latency for mobile equipment and patient data.

The CX 6300 supports advanced features such as dynamic segmentation, policy-based routing, and role-based access control. These features enhance the security and flexibility of the network by applying different policies and roles to different types of devices and users.

The CX 6300 supports Aruba NetEdit, a network configuration and orchestration tool that simplifies the management and automation of the network. This reduces the complexity and human errors involved in network configuration and maintenance.

The other options are not ideal because:

OCX 6400: This switch is designed for data center applications and does not support VSF stacking. It also does not support dynamic segmentation or policy-based routing, which are useful for network security and flexibility.

OCX 6200: This switch is designed for small to medium-sized businesses and does not support VSF stacking. It also has lower switching capacity and forwarding rate than the CX 6300, which may affect the performance of the network.

OCX 6100: This switch is designed for edge applications and does not support VSF stacking. It also has lower switching capacity and forwarding rate than the CX 6300, which may affect the performance of the network.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Keneth
17 days ago
I’m surprised the CX 6300 is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
22 days ago
OCX 6200 seems a bit underwhelming for such a big setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
27 days ago
The OCX 6400 is the way to go, no doubt. It's like the Ferrari of access switches for hospitals!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 month ago
The OCX 6100 is probably not powerful enough for a hospital this size. Gotta go with the big guns!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 month ago
Hmm, the CX 6300 might be worth considering. It's a bit more budget-friendly and could still work for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards the OCX 6200 because I think it balances performance and capacity well, but I’m not completely confident in that choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
2 months ago
The OCX 6100 seems like it could handle the load, but I feel like it might not have enough ports for such a big hospital.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 months ago
I remember practicing a question about access switches, and I think the OCX 6400 had some advantages for large deployments, but I could be mixing it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
2 months ago
I think the CX 6300 might be a good choice since it’s designed for high-density environments, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards the OCX 6100. It's designed for high-density access deployments, which sounds like what this hospital needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
2 months ago
The OCX 6200 seems like it might be the right fit here. It has the port density and stacking capabilities to handle a large hospital network like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to review the specs on those switch models to see which one can best support a 400+ port distribution rack in a VSF configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
3 months ago
The OCX 6200 seems like a good option too. It's a bit more affordable than the 6400 while still offering the required capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure the OCX 6100 can handle that many ports?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
3 months ago
I think the OCX 6400 would be the best choice for this hospital's needs. It can handle the large number of ports and provide the necessary performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
3 months ago
Definitely agree, the OCX 6400 has great performance too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
3 months ago
I think the CX 6300 is a solid choice for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
4 months ago
The key here is the large number of ports required in a single VSF stack. I think the OCX 6400 would be the best choice to handle that kind of scale and density.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
4 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully and consider the port density and scalability of the different switch models.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel